Real estate contracts - Equitable conversion (including risk of loss)

Learning Outcomes

This article explains the doctrine of equitable conversion and its impact on risk of loss in real estate contracts. After reviewing this material, you will be able to identify when equitable conversion occurs, determine who bears the risk of loss if property is damaged between contract signing and closing under majority and minority rules (including the Uniform Vendor and Purchaser Risk Act), and analyze how these principles affect parties' rights and remedies in MBE fact patterns.

MBE Syllabus

For the MBE, you are required to understand how property interests shift between contract execution and closing, particularly regarding risk of loss. You should be prepared to:

  • Define equitable conversion and its effect on title.
  • Determine when equitable conversion occurs.
  • Apply the majority rule for risk of loss (buyer bears risk).
  • Apply the minority rule/Uniform Vendor and Purchaser Risk Act (seller bears risk until possession/title transfer).
  • Analyze the impact of property destruction on the contract and remedies.
  • Understand how insurance proceeds affect risk of loss allocation.

Test Your Knowledge

Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.

  1. Under the doctrine of equitable conversion, once a specifically enforceable real estate contract is signed:
    1. Legal title immediately transfers to the buyer.
    2. The seller bears the risk of loss until closing.
    3. The buyer is considered the equitable owner of the property.
    4. The contract becomes void if the property is destroyed.
  2. In a majority of jurisdictions, if residential property under contract for sale is destroyed by fire through no fault of either party before the closing date, who bears the risk of loss?
    1. The seller, because legal title has not yet passed.
    2. The buyer, under the doctrine of equitable conversion.
    3. Neither party; the contract is automatically rescinded.
    4. The party who was in possession at the time of the fire.
  3. The Uniform Vendor and Purchaser Risk Act (UVPA), adopted in a minority of states, generally places the risk of loss due to property destruction before closing on:
    1. The buyer, from the moment the contract is signed.
    2. The seller, unless the buyer has taken possession or legal title.
    3. The party whose insurance policy covers the property.
    4. Both parties equally.

Introduction

Once parties enter into a specifically enforceable contract for the sale of land, a significant legal principle known as equitable conversion comes into play. This doctrine treats the buyer as the equitable owner of the property from the moment the contract is signed, even though legal title remains with the seller until the closing. This "conversion" has significant implications, most notably for determining who bears the risk of loss if the property is damaged or destroyed between the contract signing and the closing date. Understanding this doctrine and the associated risk of loss rules is essential for analyzing real property contract disputes on the MBE.

The Doctrine of Equitable Conversion

Equitable conversion is a legal fiction applied by courts of equity. Once a binding contract for the sale of land is executed, equity regards the buyer as the owner of the real property and the seller as the owner of the right to the purchase price (personal property). The seller retains legal title, but holds it in trust for the buyer as security for the payment of the purchase price.

Key Term: Equitable Conversion A doctrine treating the purchaser of real property as the equitable owner from the moment a specifically enforceable contract of sale is executed, even before legal title passes.

This doctrine applies only if the contract is specifically enforceable. If conditions precedent to the seller's duty to convey are not satisfied, or if the seller cannot convey marketable title and the buyer seeks rescission, equitable conversion does not occur.

Risk of Loss

A major consequence of equitable conversion concerns who bears the risk if the property is destroyed or damaged after the contract is signed but before the closing, through no fault of either party (e.g., by fire, flood, tornado).

Majority Rule: Buyer Bears the Risk

In a majority of jurisdictions, the doctrine of equitable conversion places the risk of loss squarely on the buyer. Because the buyer is considered the equitable owner from the contract date, the buyer must still pay the full contract price even if the property is destroyed or damaged before closing. The seller, holding legal title as security, is entitled to the purchase money.

Worked Example 1.1

Seller contracted to sell her house to Buyer for 300,000.Thecontractwasspecificallyenforceable.Oneweekbeforethescheduledclosingdate,thehousewascompletelydestroyedbyafirecausedbylightning.Thejurisdictionfollowsthemajorityruleregardingriskofloss.MustBuyerstillproceedwiththeclosingandpaythe300,000. The contract was specifically enforceable. One week before the scheduled closing date, the house was completely destroyed by a fire caused by lightning. The jurisdiction follows the majority rule regarding risk of loss. Must Buyer still proceed with the closing and pay the 300,000?

Answer: Yes. Under the majority rule, equitable conversion occurred when the contract was signed, making Buyer the equitable owner. As equitable owner, Buyer bears the risk of loss from casualty destruction occurring before closing. Buyer must pay the full contract price, despite the house's destruction.

Minority Rule / Uniform Vendor and Purchaser Risk Act (UVPA)

A significant minority of states reject the majority rule and follow the approach outlined in the UVPA. Under this view, the risk of loss remains with the seller until either:

  1. The buyer takes possession of the property; OR
  2. The buyer receives legal title to the property (i.e., the deed is delivered at closing).

If the property is destroyed or materially damaged before either of these events occurs, the buyer may typically rescind the contract and recover any down payment.

Key Term: Risk of Loss The allocation between buyer and seller of responsibility for damage or destruction of property occurring between the signing of the contract and the closing.

Effect of Insurance

If the property is destroyed and the seller has casualty insurance, courts almost universally require the seller (in a majority rule jurisdiction where the buyer bears the risk) to credit any insurance proceeds received against the purchase price the buyer must pay. To allow the seller to collect both the full purchase price and the insurance proceeds would constitute unjust enrichment.

Worked Example 1.2

Same facts as Worked Example 1.1 (house destroyed by fire before closing in a majority rule jurisdiction), but Seller maintained a fire insurance policy on the house and collected $250,000 from the insurer. How much must Buyer pay Seller at closing?

Answer: 50,000.AlthoughBuyerbearstheriskoflossandnormallyowesthefull50,000. Although Buyer bears the risk of loss and normally owes the full 300,000 contract price, Seller must credit the $250,000 insurance proceeds against the purchase price to avoid unjust enrichment. Buyer effectively gets the benefit of Seller's insurance policy in this situation.

Passage of Title on Death

Equitable conversion also impacts how property passes if a party dies between contract signing and closing.

  • Death of Seller: If the seller dies, the "bare" legal title passes to the takers of the seller's real property (heirs or devisees), but they must honor the contract and transfer title to the buyer at closing. The right to receive the purchase price (personal property) passes to those taking the seller's personal property.
  • Death of Buyer: If the buyer dies, the buyer's interest in the real property passes to those taking the buyer's real property. They can demand conveyance of the land at closing. Under the (now largely abolished) doctrine of exoneration, the purchase price was payable out of the buyer's personal property estate. Today, in most states, the devisee or heir takes the property subject to the seller's lien for the unpaid purchase price.

Key Point Checklist

This article has covered the following key knowledge points:

  • Equitable conversion treats the buyer as the equitable owner upon signing a specifically enforceable land sale contract.
  • The seller retains legal title in trust as security for the purchase price.
  • Risk of loss refers to who bears responsibility for destruction/damage between contract and closing.
  • Majority Rule: Buyer bears the risk of loss (equitable conversion).
  • Minority Rule (UVPA): Seller bears the risk of loss until the buyer takes possession or legal title.
  • If the seller collects insurance proceeds, they must typically be credited against the purchase price owed by the party bearing the risk (usually the buyer in majority jurisdictions).
  • Equitable conversion affects the characterization of the deceased party's interest (real vs. personal property) for inheritance purposes.

Key Terms and Concepts

  • Equitable Conversion
  • Risk of Loss
The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
AdaptiBar
One-time Fee
$395
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
BarPrepHero
One-time Fee
$299
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Quimbee
One-time Fee
$1,199

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal