Learning Outcomes
After reading this article, you will be able to explain the doctrine of intergovernmental immunities in the U.S. federal system. You will understand the constitutional limits on federal and state power to tax or regulate each other, the anti-commandeering rule, and the scope of immunity for state and federal governments. You will be able to apply these principles to MBE-style questions.
MBE Syllabus
For MBE, you are required to understand the constitutional principles governing the relationship between the federal government and the states. This includes the limits on each sovereign’s power to tax or regulate the other, and the doctrine of intergovernmental immunities. For revision, focus on:
- The federal government's immunity from direct state regulation and taxation.
- The states' lack of immunity from direct federal regulation.
- The anti-commandeering principle prohibiting Congress from requiring states to enact or enforce federal programs.
- The distinction between direct and indirect taxation or regulation.
- The scope of immunity for state officers and federal officers.
- The exceptions to immunity, including congressional abrogation under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Test Your Knowledge
Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.
-
Which of the following is most accurate regarding the federal government’s immunity from state taxation?
- The federal government is immune from all state taxes, direct or indirect.
- The federal government is only immune from direct state taxes or regulation.
- The federal government is not immune from any state taxation.
- The federal government is only immune from taxes on its employees’ salaries.
-
Congress passes a law requiring state police to enforce a new federal environmental regulation. Is this law constitutional?
- Yes, because Congress can regulate the states under the Commerce Clause.
- Yes, because Congress can use the Spending Power to require state enforcement.
- No, because the anti-commandeering principle prohibits Congress from compelling states to enforce federal law.
- No, because the Tenth Amendment prohibits all federal regulation of states.
-
Can a state tax the income of federal employees who live in the state?
- No, states may never tax federal employees.
- Yes, but only if the tax does not discriminate against federal employees.
- Yes, and states may tax federal agencies directly.
- No, unless Congress consents.
Introduction
The U.S. Constitution creates a federal system in which both the federal government and the states have sovereign powers. However, the Constitution also places important limits on each sovereign’s ability to tax or regulate the other. These limits are known as intergovernmental immunities. Understanding these immunities is essential for analyzing federalism questions on the MBE.
Federal Immunity from State Taxation and Regulation
The federal government is generally immune from direct state regulation or taxation. States may not directly tax or regulate the federal government or its instrumentalities unless Congress consents. However, states may impose nondiscriminatory, indirect taxes that apply equally to private parties and the federal government, such as general income taxes on federal employees.
Key Term: Intergovernmental Immunity The constitutional doctrine that limits the ability of federal and state governments to tax or regulate each other.
Key Term: Direct Taxation or Regulation A tax or regulation that specifically targets the federal government or its agencies, rather than applying generally to the public.
Key Term: Indirect Taxation A tax that applies generally to all persons or entities, including federal employees, and does not single out the federal government.
State Immunity from Federal Regulation
States do not enjoy the same immunity from federal regulation. Congress may regulate state activities directly under its enumerated powers, such as the Commerce Clause, unless the regulation violates another constitutional provision. However, Congress may not "commandeer" state governments by requiring them to enact or enforce federal regulatory programs.
Key Term: Anti-Commandeering Principle The rule that Congress cannot require states or state officials to enact, administer, or enforce federal regulatory programs.
The Anti-Commandeering Rule
The Supreme Court has held that Congress may not compel states to legislate or enforce a federal regulatory scheme. Congress may encourage state cooperation through conditional grants of federal funds (using the Spending Power), but it cannot directly require states to implement federal law.
Taxation of Federal Employees and Instrumentalities
States may tax the income of federal employees who reside in the state, as long as the tax is nondiscriminatory and does not single out federal employees for unfavorable treatment. States may not impose taxes that directly burden the federal government or its agencies.
Immunity of State Officers and Federal Officers
State officers are not immune from direct federal regulation or liability for violating federal law. Similarly, federal officers are immune from state regulation only when acting within the scope of their official duties. Congress may abrogate state immunity under the Fourteenth Amendment to enforce individual rights.
Worked Example 1.1
A state passes a law imposing a special tax on the income of all federal employees working within the state, but not on other residents. Is this tax constitutional?
Answer: No. The federal government and its employees are immune from discriminatory state taxation. States may tax federal employees only if the tax applies equally to all residents and does not single out federal employees for unfavorable treatment.
Worked Example 1.2
Congress enacts a statute requiring state legislatures to pass laws banning the sale of a certain product. Is this statute valid?
Answer: No. The anti-commandeering principle prohibits Congress from requiring states to enact or enforce federal regulatory programs. Congress may regulate the product directly or encourage state action through conditional funding, but it cannot compel state legislatures to act.
Worked Example 1.3
A state imposes a general sales tax that applies to all purchases, including those made by federal agencies. Is this tax valid?
Answer: Yes, if the tax is nondiscriminatory and applies equally to all purchasers, including the federal government. States may not, however, impose taxes that specifically target federal agencies or interfere with federal functions.
Exam Warning
The MBE may test subtle distinctions between direct and indirect taxation or regulation. Always ask whether the law targets the federal government specifically or applies generally to all.
Revision Tip
Remember: Congress cannot force states to legislate or enforce federal law, but it can regulate states directly under its enumerated powers or use conditional funding.
Key Point Checklist
This article has covered the following key knowledge points:
- The federal government is generally immune from direct state taxation and regulation.
- States may impose nondiscriminatory, indirect taxes on federal employees, but not taxes that single out federal entities.
- States are not immune from direct federal regulation, but Congress cannot commandeer state governments to enact or enforce federal law.
- The anti-commandeering principle prohibits Congress from compelling state legislative or executive action.
- State and federal officers have limited immunity; Congress may abrogate state immunity under the Fourteenth Amendment.
- Always distinguish between direct and indirect taxation or regulation for MBE questions.
Key Terms and Concepts
- Intergovernmental Immunity
- Direct Taxation or Regulation
- Indirect Taxation
- Anti-Commandeering Principle
