## Facts

- *The Jerry Springer Show* was a reality television talk show produced by Multimedia Entertainment, Inc. (Multimedia) and hosted by Jerry Springer.
- Tracy Pemerton agreed to appear on the show only if his archenemy, Lester McQuery, would not be invited to appear.
- Show personnel assured Pemerton that McQuery would not be on the program.
- Relying on those assurances, Pemerton signed a pre-show release providing that any claims arising from the release or from his appearance on the show would be submitted to arbitration.
- McQuery did appear during the taping and assaulted Pemerton from behind.
- Pemerton filed suit seeking damages for injuries connected to the taping.
- Multimedia and Springer moved to stay the court case and compel arbitration under the release’s arbitration provision.
- Pemerton opposed the motion, arguing the arbitration clause could not be enforced because he was fraudulently induced to sign the release.

## Issues

1. Whether an arbitration clause in a pre-show release is enforceable when the plaintiff claims he was fraudulently induced to sign the release based on misrepresentations about who would appear on the show.
2. Whether, under the Federal Arbitration Act, a fraud-in-the-inducement challenge directed at the release as a whole must be decided in arbitration rather than by the court.
3. Whether Pemerton’s injury claims stemming from the taping fall within the release’s arbitration language applying to claims arising from the release or from his appearance.

## Decision

- The court granted the defendants’ motion to stay the judicial proceedings and compel arbitration.
- The court treated Pemerton’s fraudulent-inducement argument as a challenge to the validity of the release generally, not a challenge aimed specifically at the arbitration provision.
- Because the alleged misrepresentations concerned the conditions of Pemerton’s participation on the show (McQuery’s presence) rather than the arbitration clause itself, the court left the fraud dispute for the arbitrator.
- The court concluded the claims tied to Pemerton’s appearance and the taping were subject to the release’s arbitration requirement.

## Legal Principles

- The Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to enforce written arbitration agreements according to their terms when the agreement is valid and the dispute falls within its scope.
- When a party claims fraud in the inducement of the contract as a whole, that dispute is for the arbitrator; a court decides only challenges directed specifically to the arbitration clause (or to contract formation of the arbitration agreement).
- Broad arbitration language applying to claims “arising from” a release or a party’s appearance reaches tort claims for injuries allegedly suffered during the appearance.
- When a dispute is subject to arbitration, the court should stay the litigation and order the parties to proceed in arbitration.

## Conclusion

The court stayed Pemerton’s lawsuit and compelled arbitration because his fraudulent-inducement theory attacked the release overall (based on assurances about McQuery’s presence) rather than the arbitration clause itself, and his injury claims connected to the taping arose from his appearance and therefore fell within the release’s arbitration provision.


Pemerton v. Springer, 1995 WL 579465 (1995)