## Facts

- A residence in Upland, California was burglarized, and property worth over $200 was stolen, including office equipment and electronics.
- Police observed a Cadillac carrying items consistent with stolen property; the officers later located the Cadillac parked and linked it and its contents to the burglary.
- The prosecution’s evidence connected Frank John Antick and Donald Bose as accomplices in the burglary/theft and associated possession/transport of the stolen property.
- Bose encountered police, fired at them, and police returned fire, killing Bose.
- Antick was charged with burglary, grand theft, assault with a deadly weapon on a peace officer, and first-degree murder, plus prior convictions and arming allegations.
- The murder theory did not claim Antick killed anyone; it asserted liability for Bose’s death under felony murder and related vicarious-liability theories.
- A jury convicted Antick on all counts and found first-degree burglary and first-degree murder; the trial court imposed consecutive terms.
- Antick appealed, principally challenging the murder conviction based on the police killing of his accomplice.

## Issues

1. Whether first-degree felony murder applies when the only death is a co-felon killed by police acting in lawful resistance during the felony or immediate flight.
2. Whether an accomplice may be held vicariously liable for “murder” when the decedent is the accomplice himself and the lethal act is committed by a resisting third party (police) in justified defense.
3. Whether the murder-related instructions and resulting murder judgment could stand given the limits of felony murder and accomplice liability under California law.

## Decision

- The court reversed Antick’s first-degree murder conviction and related findings.
- The court held the felony-murder rule does not make a surviving felon liable for the justifiable killing of a co-felon by police resisting the felonious attack.
- The court rejected the prosecution’s attempt to impose murder liability through a vicarious-liability chain based on Bose’s assault leading to Bose’s own death.
- The court affirmed the convictions for burglary, grand theft, and assault with a deadly weapon on a peace officer.
- The matter was remanded for further proceedings consistent with reversal of the murder conviction, including resentencing.

## Legal Principles

- California’s felony-murder doctrine follows an agency approach: the “killing” supporting felony-murder liability must be committed by the felon or an accomplice, not by a victim or police officer resisting the felony.
- Felony-murder liability does not attach where a police officer or other resistor justifiably kills a co-felon during the felony or its immediate aftermath.
- A proximate-cause theory that treats any death foreseeably resulting from the felony as murder is not the governing approach for these circumstances under California law.
- Accomplice liability for a confederate’s crimes does not, without more, convert a justified third-party killing of that confederate into murder liability for the surviving participant.

## Conclusion

The court set aside the murder conviction because the only homicide was the lawful police killing of Antick’s accomplice, which could not be attributed to Antick under California’s agency-based felony-murder rule or under an expanded vicarious-liability theory; the non-homicide convictions were left intact and the case was remanded for resentencing.


People v. Antick, 15 Cal. 3d 79, 539 P.2d 43 (Cal. 1975)