## Facts

- The Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, a trade association representing drug companies, sued the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare and FDA officials in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
- The suit challenged FDA regulations published December 24, 1974 (39 Fed. Reg. 44601–44652) that governed how FDA would respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for records submitted by drug manufacturers during the drug testing and approval process.
- The association alleged that FDA’s work depends on receiving sensitive commercial information from manufacturers and that certain submitted material can have substantial economic value.
- FDA had acknowledged in the regulatory preamble that manufacturers can have a property interest in some sensitive information and that disclosure could cause significant competitive loss.
- The association sought a preliminary injunction to stop FDA from applying and enforcing the disclosure regulations unless FDA first gave the affected company advance notice of any proposed release of information in response to a FOIA request.
- The requested injunction would require notice and an opportunity to consult with FDA about whether the material should be withheld, plus time for the company to seek judicial review before any disclosure occurred.
- The court addressed only whether preliminary injunctive relief was warranted, not a final ruling on the overall legality of the regulations.

## Issues

1. Whether the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction to halt FDA’s FOIA disclosure regulations unless FDA provided across-the-board pre-disclosure notice and time for judicial review.
2. Whether FOIA, related confidentiality statutes, or due process required FDA to provide blanket prior notice to drug companies before releasing any submitted information responsive to FOIA requests.

## Decision

- The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
- The association did not carry its burden to show a strong likelihood of success on the merits of its claim that the law required a universal notice-and-delay procedure for FOIA releases.
- Although the court recognized that disclosure of genuinely confidential commercial information can cause serious economic harm, it found the showing of irreparable injury insufficient to justify the broad, preliminary relief requested.
- The court treated FOIA’s statutory structure—disclosure subject to specific exemptions—as providing the primary method for protecting confidential commercial material, with disputes handled as needed rather than by suspending the regulatory scheme as a whole.
- The court concluded that an injunction would significantly interfere with FDA’s administration of FOIA and delay access to agency records, and that these effects weighed against preliminary relief.

## Legal Principles

- A preliminary injunction requires the movant to show: (1) likelihood of success on the merits, (2) irreparable harm absent relief, (3) that the balance of harms favors relief, and (4) that relief is consistent with the public interest.
- FOIA establishes a general rule of disclosure, limited by enumerated exemptions, including protection for trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information.
- Even where submitters have protectable interests in certain information given to the government, FOIA does not automatically confer a general right to advance notice and an opportunity for pre-disclosure court review for every contemplated release.
- Requests for sweeping, industry-wide procedural requirements are disfavored at the preliminary stage when the governing statutes and regulations already provide mechanisms (exemptions and judicial review in particular cases) to address confidentiality claims.
- In evaluating irreparable harm from possible disclosure, courts consider whether the asserted risk is concrete and imminent and whether narrower, record-specific remedies are available without halting an agency’s disclosure framework.

## Conclusion

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association v. Weinberger held that a trade association of drug manufacturers was not entitled to a preliminary injunction that would have forced FDA to provide blanket pre-release notice and time for judicial review before responding to FOIA requests, because the association failed to make the necessary showing—especially on likelihood of success and irreparable harm—and because FOIA’s exemption-based, case-specific approach and the public’s statutory access to agency records weighed against such broad interim relief.


Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association v. Weinberger, 401 F. Supp. 444 (1975)