Pickford v Quirke (1927) 13 TC 251

Facts

  • A group including Mr. Quirke purchased a cotton-spinning mill, operated it temporarily, and then sold it at a profit.
  • This process of buying, operating, and selling mills for profit was repeated on several occasions by the group.
  • Mr. Quirke argued that the profits represented capital gains and were not taxable as income.
  • The tax authorities asserted that the repeated nature of the transactions constituted trading activity and that the profits were therefore taxable as income.

Issues

  1. Whether the repeated purchases and sales of mills amounted to trading activities subject to income tax or one-off transactions resulting in capital gains.
  2. Whether the pattern of similar transactions indicated organized profit-making sufficient to be categorized as trading.
  3. Whether the application of the "badges of trade" could determine the nature of the profits in this case.

Decision

  • The High Court ruled in favor of the tax authorities.
  • Justice Rowlatt found that, while a single transaction might be classified as investment, the repetition of similar transactions showed a systematic, organized profit-making scheme akin to trading.
  • The Court held that the overall pattern of regular and similar transactions pointed decisively to trading activity, thus making the profits taxable as income.

Legal Principles

  • The "badges of trade" are applied to distinguish trading activities from investments for tax purposes; no single factor is determinative, but combined factors strengthen the conclusion.
  • Repeated and frequent transactions involving similar assets strongly indicate trading rather than passive investment.
  • The duration of ownership, the purpose of sale, and the method of funding (such as use of short-term loans) can all support a finding of trading.
  • The context and pattern of multiple transactions matter more than isolated, single events when determining tax liability.

Conclusion

Pickford v Quirke (1927) 13 TC 251 is a foundational case recognizing that an organized pattern of repeated similar transactions may constitute trading, guiding the application of the badges of trade and clarifying the distinction between capital gains and income for tax purposes.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal