## Facts

- James Pat Malone and Roberta E. Malone were married in Texas.
- At James’s death (Nov. 20, 1973), eight life-insurance policies on his life were in force.
- James had the contractual right under the policies to change the beneficiary.
- James gratuitously named Roberta as the beneficiary on each policy.
- One policy was issued before the marriage and premiums on that policy were paid with James’s separate funds; the remaining policies were issued during the marriage and premiums were paid with community funds.
- About four years before James’s death, Pope Photo Records (Pope) became a creditor of James and Roberta for a debt treated as a community obligation.
- None of the life-insurance policies was pledged, assigned, or otherwise identified as collateral for Pope’s debt.
- After James died, the insurers paid the policy proceeds directly to Roberta as the named beneficiary.
- Roberta did not treat or list the insurance proceeds as community property after James’s death.
- Roberta did not know about the Pope debt until after James’s death, and there was no evidence that either spouse knew during the marriage that the existing community assets would be insufficient to pay Pope.
- The trial court determined that the remaining community assets (excluding the insurance proceeds) were insufficient to satisfy Pope’s claim and nevertheless held the proceeds were not subject to Pope’s collection efforts; Pope appealed.

## Issues

1. Whether a community creditor may satisfy a community debt from life-insurance proceeds paid to the insured’s spouse as the named beneficiary when the insured retained the right to change beneficiaries, the designation was gratuitous, and the policies were not pledged or assigned as security.

## Decision

- The court of appeals affirmed the judgment for Roberta.
- The life-insurance proceeds paid to Roberta as the named beneficiary were not subject to Pope’s claim for the community debt.
- Pope, as a creditor with no contractual rights under the insurance policies and no security interest in them, could not displace the beneficiary designation to collect from the proceeds on these facts.

## Legal Principles

- Life-insurance proceeds are paid according to the insurance contract; when a beneficiary is named, the insurer’s obligation at the insured’s death is to pay that beneficiary rather than the insured’s estate or general marital assets, absent a valid contractual or statutory basis to do otherwise.
- When the insured retains the right to change the beneficiary, the beneficiary’s interest before death is not a present, vested ownership interest in the policy proceeds; the right to receive proceeds matures only at death if the beneficiary remains designated.
- A general creditor does not gain rights in life-insurance proceeds merely because the insured could have changed beneficiaries during life; without an assignment, pledge, or other enforceable agreement, the creditor is not a party to the insurance contract and cannot redirect payment.
- Payment of premiums with community funds does not, by itself, give a community creditor a claim to the beneficiary’s proceeds; at most, it may raise questions of rights between marital estates, not a direct collection right in favor of an unsecured creditor.
- Absent proof of fraud or another recognized equitable basis for relief, a creditor cannot treat a gratuitous spouse-beneficiary designation as an asset available for routine debt collection.

## Conclusion

Pope Photo Records v. Malone holds that a community creditor could not reach life-insurance proceeds paid to the widow as the named beneficiary where the husband retained the contractual right to change beneficiaries, the policies were not pledged or assigned to the creditor, and the record showed no fraud or similar basis to override the insurance contract’s payment to the beneficiary.


Pope Photo Records v. Malone, 539 S.W.2d 224 (1976)