Porter v Magill [2002] 2 AC 357

Facts

  • The case concerned Dame Shirley Porter, former leader of Westminster City Council, who was accused of implementing a policy of designated sales of council housing in marginal wards to bolster Conservative party support.
  • District Auditor John Magill surcharged Porter and her colleagues for financial losses suffered by the council due to this policy.
  • Porter challenged the auditor’s findings, asserting apparent bias, particularly objecting to Magill's pre-emptive press conferences that publicized preliminary findings before the investigation concluded.

Issues

  1. Whether the District Auditor’s conduct, particularly publicizing preliminary findings in press conferences before Porter's fair hearing, gave rise to apparent bias.
  2. What legal test should be applied to determine apparent bias in administrative decision-making.
  3. Whether the actions of Magill met the threshold for a finding of bias requiring the decision to be set aside.

Decision

  • The House of Lords articulated a new test for apparent bias: whether a fair-minded and informed observer, considering all facts, would conclude there was a real possibility of bias.
  • Applying this test, the House of Lords found that Magill's conduct in holding pre-emptive press conferences did create a real possibility of bias.
  • The finding of bias led to overturning the Court of Appeal’s decision, which had used the earlier, less stringent "real danger" test.

Legal Principles

  • The test for apparent bias is objective and focuses on the perception of a fair-minded and informed observer, not the subjective views of the parties.
  • Actual impartiality and the appearance of impartiality are both essential to preserve public confidence in administrative processes.
  • The fair-minded and informed observer is presumed to possess knowledge of the relevant facts and the decision-maker’s responsibilities, and is neither unduly suspicious nor complacent.
  • The newly established test has become central in subsequent bias jurisprudence and judicial review cases in the UK.

Conclusion

Porter v Magill clarified and redefined the law relating to apparent bias by introducing the fair-minded and informed observer test, ensuring both actual and perceived impartiality in administrative decision-making and reinforcing public confidence in the fairness of such processes.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal