Welcome

Pullan v Koe [1913] 1 Ch 9

ResourcesPullan v Koe [1913] 1 Ch 9

Facts

  • Miss Pullan, the plaintiff, was the daughter of Mr. Koe, the defendant.
  • Prior to her marriage, Mr. Koe promised Miss Pullan an annual allowance of £100, contingent upon her marrying.
  • Miss Pullan relied on this promise when she entered into the marriage.
  • After her marriage, Mr. Koe did not fulfill his promise to pay the allowance.
  • Miss Pullan brought a legal claim against Mr. Koe to enforce the promise.

Issues

  1. Whether a father's promise to provide a financial allowance to his daughter, made in contemplation of her marriage, constituted valid consideration under English contract law.
  2. Whether such a promise was intended to create legal relations or was merely a moral or social obligation.
  3. Whether the promise was sufficiently clear and specific to be legally enforceable.

Decision

  • The court held that Mr. Koe’s promise did not constitute valid consideration under English law.
  • It was found that the promise was made in a family context, giving rise to a presumption against an intention to create legal relations.
  • The court determined there was no clear evidence of a legally binding agreement.
  • The promise was regarded as too vague and lacking necessary specificity for contractual enforceability.
  • The claim brought by Miss Pullan was dismissed.
  • Marriage consideration may constitute valid consideration if the promise is clear, specific, and intended to create legal relations.
  • In family or domestic arrangements, there is a presumption against the intention to create legal relations.
  • Moral or social obligations, without more, do not give rise to enforceable contracts.
  • Clear evidence of intention and specificity of terms are required for contract formation, even in the context of marriage.

Conclusion

Pullan v Koe [1913] 1 Ch 9 clarified that promises made in contemplation of marriage require both a clear intention to create legal relations and specificity to be enforceable as contracts; mere moral obligations within a familial context are insufficient for legal enforcement.

Assistant

How can I help you?
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode

Responses can be incorrect. Please double check.