R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532 (HL)

Facts

  • Mr. Daly, a prisoner, challenged a prison policy requiring inmates to be absent during cell searches, including the search of legally privileged correspondence.
  • He argued that this policy infringed upon his common law right to confidentiality in legally privileged communications.
  • The House of Lords considered whether the policy unlawfully interfered with Mr. Daly's rights.

Issues

  1. Whether the prison policy requiring absence of inmates during cell searches, particularly of legally privileged correspondence, infringed the right to confidential legal communications.
  2. Whether the standard of review should be the traditional Wednesbury unreasonableness test or the more structured proportionality test derived from European human rights law.
  3. Whether proportionality offers a more rigorous and appropriate standard of review for cases involving fundamental rights than Wednesbury unreasonableness.

Decision

  • The House of Lords held that the prison policy unduly interfered with the right to confidential legal correspondence.
  • The Court endorsed proportionality as a more intensive and structured standard of review than Wednesbury unreasonableness in the context of fundamental rights.
  • The challenge succeeded, establishing new principles for the application of proportionality in judicial review involving human rights.

Legal Principles

  • Proportionality involves a structured test: (1) the objective must be sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right; (2) the measures adopted must be rationally connected to the objective; (3) the means must be no more than necessary; (4) there must be a fair balance between individual rights and community interests.
  • Proportionality provides greater judicial scrutiny than Wednesbury unreasonableness by requiring necessity and balancing of competing interests.
  • The intensity of review under proportionality may vary according to context, the nature of the right involved, and the knowledge of the decision-maker.

Conclusion

R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department marked a significant shift in UK administrative law by confirming proportionality as the leading standard of review for human rights cases, providing a structured and rigorous approach that ensures a fair balance between individual rights and public interests.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal