Facts
- Mr. Daly, a prisoner, challenged a prison policy requiring inmates to be absent during cell searches, including the search of legally privileged correspondence.
- He argued that this policy infringed upon his common law right to confidentiality in legally privileged communications.
- The House of Lords considered whether the policy unlawfully interfered with Mr. Daly's rights.
Issues
- Whether the prison policy requiring absence of inmates during cell searches, particularly of legally privileged correspondence, infringed the right to confidential legal communications.
- Whether the standard of review should be the traditional Wednesbury unreasonableness test or the more structured proportionality test derived from European human rights law.
- Whether proportionality offers a more rigorous and appropriate standard of review for cases involving fundamental rights than Wednesbury unreasonableness.
Decision
- The House of Lords held that the prison policy unduly interfered with the right to confidential legal correspondence.
- The Court endorsed proportionality as a more intensive and structured standard of review than Wednesbury unreasonableness in the context of fundamental rights.
- The challenge succeeded, establishing new principles for the application of proportionality in judicial review involving human rights.
Legal Principles
- Proportionality involves a structured test: (1) the objective must be sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right; (2) the measures adopted must be rationally connected to the objective; (3) the means must be no more than necessary; (4) there must be a fair balance between individual rights and community interests.
- Proportionality provides greater judicial scrutiny than Wednesbury unreasonableness by requiring necessity and balancing of competing interests.
- The intensity of review under proportionality may vary according to context, the nature of the right involved, and the knowledge of the decision-maker.
Conclusion
R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department marked a significant shift in UK administrative law by confirming proportionality as the leading standard of review for human rights cases, providing a structured and rigorous approach that ensures a fair balance between individual rights and public interests.