R v Allen [1872] LR 1 CCR 367

Facts

  • The defendant, Allen, was charged with bigamy for undergoing a second marriage ceremony while his first wife was still alive.
  • The offense of bigamy was criminalised to protect the monogamous nature of marriage and the integrity of marriage contracts.
  • Allen argued that because his second marriage was not legally valid, he could not be convicted of bigamy.
  • The defense's position was that a bigamous marriage is void and therefore not a marriage, contending no crime was committed.
  • The court had to determine whether participating in a marriage ceremony, irrespective of its legal validity, satisfied the requirements of the bigamy statute.

Issues

  1. Whether participation in a second marriage ceremony while still married constitutes bigamy when the subsequent marriage is legally void.
  2. Whether statutory interpretation should follow the literal wording of the bigamy statute or the legislative purpose it was designed to serve.

Decision

  • The court concluded that the act of going through a marriage ceremony while a prior marriage subsisted fulfills the criminal element of bigamy, regardless of the validity of the second marriage.
  • The defendant's argument that a void ceremony could not amount to bigamy was rejected.
  • A literal interpretation, as argued by the defense, would render the offense meaningless, since all bigamous marriages are necessarily invalid.
  • The court instead adopted a purposive approach, interpreting the statute in light of the mischief it aimed to prevent.

Legal Principles

  • The golden rule of statutory interpretation permits deviation from literal meaning to avoid absurd or illogical results.
  • A purposive approach to interpretation should be adopted where strict literalism would defeat the intention of Parliament or the efficacy of the statute.
  • The actus reus of bigamy is satisfied by going through a marriage ceremony while a prior legal marriage remains in effect, irrespective of the legal validity of the second union.

Conclusion

R v Allen [1872] LR 1 CCR 367 established that participation in a second marriage ceremony constitutes bigamy even if the ceremony is invalid, demonstrating the application of the golden rule to ensure statutes fulfill their intended purpose and do not yield absurd results.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal