R v Burgess [1991] 2 QB 92

Facts

  • The defendant, Mr. Burgess, injured a woman while allegedly sleepwalking, striking her with a video recorder and a bottle.
  • Medical evidence at trial indicated that Mr. Burgess suffered from a sleep disorder, classified as a form of non-insane automatism.
  • The trial judge instructed the jury to consider the insanity defense rather than non-insane automatism.
  • Mr. Burgess appealed the trial judge’s ruling.

Issues

  1. Whether sleepwalking should be treated as an internal or external cause for the purposes of the automatism defense.
  2. Whether the defendant should be entitled to a defense of non-insane automatism or be subject to the insanity defense.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s direction requiring the jury to consider the insanity defense.
  • The court found that sleepwalking constitutes an internal condition, aligning it with insanity rather than non-insane automatism.
  • The court distinguished between internal causes (such as sleepwalking and epilepsy) and external causes (such as physical blows), citing prior cases including Bratty v Attorney-General for Northern Ireland [1963] AC 386 and R v Quick [1973] QB 910.
  • The judgment emphasized that internal factors, being prone to recurrence, require the protections and responsibilities of the insanity verdict.
  • The decision resulted in a special verdict of “not guilty by reason of insanity” rather than a full acquittal.

Legal Principles

  • Automatism as a defense requires analysis of whether the involuntary action arose from an internal or external cause.
  • Internal causes, such as medical conditions present in the defendant, fall under the insanity defense.
  • External causes, such as sudden blows or accidental drug use, may provide a full acquittal through non-insane automatism.
  • Sleepwalking is legally categorized as an internal cause, analogous to epilepsy, and thus subject to the insanity defense.
  • The insanity defense can lead to court-ordered supervision where public safety is a concern.

Conclusion

R v Burgess established that sleepwalking is classified as an internal cause requiring the insanity defense, shaping subsequent case law by clarifying the distinction between internal and external causes in automatism and ensuring public safety through appropriate legal responses.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal