Welcome

R v Clegg [1995] 1 AC 482

ResourcesR v Clegg [1995] 1 AC 482

Facts

  • The defendant, a soldier stationed at a checkpoint in Northern Ireland, fired four shots at a speeding vehicle approaching the checkpoint.
  • The vehicle was subsequently found to have been stolen.
  • The fourth shot fired by the defendant resulted in the death of a passenger in the vehicle.
  • The defendant was charged with murder and claimed the shots were fired in self-defence.
  • Key considerations included the timing and circumstances of the shots, especially the fourth shot after the vehicle had passed the checkpoint.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant could successfully claim self-defence when force used exceeded what was necessary, particularly in relation to the fourth shot.
  2. Whether the law should distinguish between excessive force used in self-defence, prevention of crime, or apprehension of offenders.
  3. Whether self-defence could be maintained as a complete defence when the perceived threat had subsided.

Decision

  • The House of Lords upheld the conviction for murder.
  • The court determined that the fourth shot was not fired in self-defence, as the immediate threat had passed.
  • It was held that excessive or disproportionate force cannot be justified as self-defence.
  • The principle applied equally to self-defence, prevention of crime, and apprehension of offenders.
  • Self-defence is only a valid defence where the force used is reasonable, necessary, and proportionate to the threat.
  • Using force after the immediate threat has subsided is not protected by self-defence.
  • The law does not distinguish between contexts (self-defence, prevention of crime, apprehension of offenders) when assessing the proportionality of force.
  • A use of force grossly exceeding what is required leads to criminal liability, including for murder.

Conclusion

The House of Lords confirmed that self-defence cannot excuse a use of force exceeding what is necessary to meet the perceived threat; excessive force results in criminal liability regardless of the context, reaffirming strict limits on lawful self-defence.

Assistant

How can I help you?
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode

Responses can be incorrect. Please double check.