R v Codere (1916) 12 Cr App R 21

Facts

  • The defendant, Codere, appealed against a murder conviction.
  • At trial, expert witnesses presented differing views on whether Codere could be certified insane.
  • The appeal focused on whether Codere's mental state satisfied the insanity defense as defined by the M’Naghten rules.
  • The defense argued that Codere’s actions indicated a lack of understanding of the act's wrongfulness.
  • The prosecution contended Codere understood the nature of his act and its illegality.
  • Evidence showed Codere was “abnormal mentally,” but the court examined whether this met the threshold for insanity under legal standards.

Issues

  1. Whether Codere’s mental condition at the time of the act fulfilled the requirements for the insanity defense under the M’Naghten rules.
  2. Whether a lack of understanding of the “nature and quality” of the act, as interpreted by the court, should absolve criminal liability.
  3. Whether awareness that the act was contrary to law precludes reliance on the insanity defense, even where mental abnormality is present.

Decision

  • The court clarified that “nature and quality” refers primarily to an understanding of the physical act and its legal wrongfulness, not merely its physical characteristics.
  • It was determined that Codere understood both what he was physically doing and that his act was illegal.
  • The court found the presence of mental abnormality alone insufficient for a successful insanity defense if the defendant understands the act's wrongfulness in law.
  • Codere’s appeal was dismissed and his conviction upheld.

Legal Principles

  • For the insanity defense under the M’Naghten rules to succeed, a defendant must lack understanding of either the “nature and quality” of the act or that the act is wrong.
  • “Nature and quality” was held to include knowledge that an act is contrary to law; mere mental abnormality, without such lack of knowledge, is not enough.
  • Criminal responsibility is maintained if the accused understands both the physical aspects and legal implications of their actions, even when mentally abnormal.

Conclusion

The court in R v Codere confirmed that the insanity defense requires a lack of awareness of an act’s physical nature or its illegality; mental abnormality alone does not absolve criminal liability where the defendant comprehends the wrongfulness of the act under the law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal