Facts
- The defendant, a doctor, falsely told a young woman with intellectual disabilities that he was performing surgery.
- Relying on this deception, the woman consented to sexual acts, believing she was undergoing a medical procedure.
- The court found that the woman's consent was invalid due to her misunderstanding about the real purpose of the act.
- The Court of Crown Cases Reserved upheld the defendant's conviction for rape, finding the deception negated any possible legal consent.
Issues
- Whether consent can be considered valid when obtained through deception regarding the kind and purpose of a sexual act.
- Whether the victim’s belief, shaped by the defendant’s deception, can render consent legally ineffective.
- How to distinguish between deception about the act’s purpose and deception about collateral matters.
Decision
- The court held that consent obtained by deceiving a person as to the nature and purpose of the act is not valid consent.
- The defendant’s conviction for rape was upheld, as the victim’s belief that she was receiving surgery invalidated her consent to the sexual act.
- The court distinguished between deception as to the act’s purpose and deception about other matters, confirming only the former negates consent in law.
Legal Principles
- Deception about the kind or purpose of an act vitiates consent in sexual offences.
- The relevant deception must relate to the actual act, not to ancillary issues such as identity or promises.
- An objective standard is applied to determine the nature and purpose of the act, while the individual's beliefs help prove whether a relevant deception has occurred.
- The principle emphasizes the necessity of explicit, informed agreement, especially for vulnerable individuals susceptible to deception.
- The distinction between deception about the act itself and deception about other matters is critical for determining when consent is legally negated.
Conclusion
R v Flattery established that consent to sexual activity is void if obtained by deceiving a person about the nature or purpose of the act, a rule that protects vulnerable individuals and remains central to the law on sexual offences.