R v Gomez [1993] AC 442 (HL)

Facts

  • The defendant, a shop assistant manager, agreed to accept stolen cheques as payment for goods.
  • He misled the shop manager by falsely claiming the cheques were valid, thereby securing the manager’s approval for the sale.
  • The manager's consent to the transaction was based on the false representation regarding the cheques’ validity.
  • The House of Lords considered whether this amounted to appropriation within the meaning of the Theft Act 1968.

Issues

  1. Does appropriation under the Theft Act 1968 require adverse interference with or usurpation of the owner’s rights?
  2. Can a defendant appropriate property when the owner’s consent is obtained by deception?
  3. How should the definition of appropriation be applied in cases involving consent secured through falsehoods?

Decision

  • The House of Lords held that appropriation can occur even where the owner apparently consents to the transfer, if such consent results from deception.
  • It was determined that assuming the rights of an owner is sufficient for appropriation under the Theft Act 1968, regardless of the owner’s actual agreement.
  • The court rejected the previous position established in R v Morris, which required adverse action against the owner’s rights for appropriation to occur.
  • The decision broadened the meaning of appropriation in the context of theft.

Legal Principles

  • Appropriation does not require the act to be against the owner’s interests if consent is obtained through deception.
  • Deceptively inducing the owner to consent equates to an appropriation under the Theft Act 1968.
  • The ruling relied on the precedent set in Lawrence v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, extending its application to situations where deception produces consent.
  • Following Gomez, subsequent cases such as R v Hinks have interpreted even gifts as appropriation where dishonesty is present.

Conclusion

R v Gomez clarified that appropriation under the Theft Act 1968 can include instances where the owner’s consent to transfer property is obtained by deception, thus expanding the scope of liability for theft to cover a wider range of deceptive property transfers and establishing a central principle in the law of theft.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal