R v Graham [1982] 1 All ER 801

Facts

  • The case of R v Graham established a framework for the defense of duress of circumstances in criminal law.
  • Duress of circumstances arises when an individual commits an offense to avoid a perceived imminent threat of death or serious injury, without a specific demand from another person.
  • The courts have developed a two-stage test in R v Graham [1982] 1 All ER 801, applied in subsequent cases such as R v Martin [1989] 1 All ER 652 and R v Howe [1987] AC 417.
  • In R v Martin, the defendant drove while disqualified because his wife threatened to commit suicide if he did not drive their son to work; the court considered whether this threat constituted duress.

Issues

  1. Whether the defense of duress of circumstances requires both a subjective perception of an imminent threat and an objective reasonableness in response.
  2. Whether a threat of suicide by another person can amount to a threat of death or serious injury for the purposes of duress of circumstances.
  3. How duress of circumstances differs from duress by direct threats.
  4. What are the limitations and exclusions applicable to the defense of duress of circumstances.

Decision

  • The courts affirmed the two-stage test for duress of circumstances: (1) the defendant must genuinely believe in an imminent threat of death or serious injury (subjective test); and (2) a sober person of reasonable firmness would have acted similarly in such circumstances (objective test).
  • In Martin, the court held that the threat of suicide could constitute a sufficient threat of death or serious injury, satisfying the first limb of the Graham test.
  • The objective test in Martin focused on whether a reasonable person sharing the defendant’s characteristics would have responded as the defendant did, considering the immediacy and gravity of the threat.
  • The defense of duress of circumstances was distinguished from duress by direct threats, emphasizing that the former stems from circumstances rather than explicit demands.
  • The defense is limited and unavailable for offenses such as murder, attempted murder, and certain treason offenses, and is only applicable where the threat is immediate.
  • Duress of circumstances is grounded in the principle that individuals should not be criminally liable when their will is overborne by a threat of immediate harm.
  • The two-stage test (as derived from R v Graham) requires both a genuine belief in immediate harm and a response that meets the standard of a reasonable person.
  • Threats of suicide can amount to threats of death or serious injury.
  • The distinction between duress of circumstances and duress by threats lies in the source of compulsion: external circumstances versus direct threats.
  • The defense does not apply to murder, attempted murder, certain forms of treason, or where the threat is not immediate.

Conclusion

R v Graham established the key two-stage test for duress of circumstances, requiring both subjective belief in imminent threat and objective reasonableness of response. This framework, affirmed and applied in cases such as Martin, clarified the scope, limitations, and distinction of this defense within criminal law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal