R v Jones [1990] 1 W.L.R. 1057

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Zoe, who holds deep animosity towards her former friend Mark, decides to confront him one evening. She purchases a crossbow and obtains bolts to ensure it is operational. She then waits inside Mark’s car while he finishes work. As Mark enters the car, Zoe points the loaded crossbow at him and exclaims, “This ends now.” Mark manages to quickly disarm her before she can fire, resulting in charges of attempted murder against Zoe.


Which of the following statements best describes whether Zoe has crossed the line from mere preparation to attempt in these circumstances?

Introduction

The criminal law doctrine of attempt criminalizes conduct that moves past preparation and shows a clear intent to commit a specific offense. R v Jones [1990] 1 W.L.R. 1057 sets a key legal standard in English criminal law for determining when actions shift from preparation to attempted crime. The Court of Appeal’s judgment explains the difference between preparatory acts and those that form an attempt, stating the requirement for an act that is "more than preparation" to the intended offense. This case looks at how close the defendant’s actions must be to the completed offense, creating a basis for assessing evidence in attempt cases.

The Facts of R v Jones

In this case, the appellant, Jones, planned to kill his ex-girlfriend’s new partner. He obtained a shotgun, shortened the barrel, and went to the victim’s workplace. Jones got into the victim’s car, aimed the loaded shotgun at him, and stated, "You are not going to like this." However, the victim disarmed him before he could shoot. Jones was later charged with attempted murder.

The Court of Appeal's Ruling

The Court of Appeal confirmed Jones’s conviction for attempted murder. The court found his actions went beyond preparation and formed an attempt. Lord Justice Lloyd, in the leading judgment, stated that the actus reus of attempt requires an act that is "more than preparation" to the intended crime. The court concluded that Jones’s acts—obtaining and modifying the weapon, going to the victim’s location, entering the car, and aiming the loaded shotgun—were close enough to the completed offense of murder to count as an attempt.

The "Last Act" Test and its Limits

Before R v Jones, some courts used the "last act" test, which demanded the defendant complete the final step before the full offense. However, R v Jones rejected this strict approach, stating an attempt can occur even without the final act. Lord Justice Lloyd explained the focus should be on whether the defendant moved past preparation, not whether they took the last step.

"More than Preparation": A Jury Question

The Court of Appeal in R v Jones ruled that deciding whether an act is "more than preparation" is a factual matter for the jury, guided by the trial judge’s directions. This allows flexibility, recognizing the varied situations in attempt cases.

Later Cases and the Influence of R v Jones

R v Jones has been cited in many later attempt cases. It remains a key reference in English attempt law. Cases like R v Geddes [1996] Crim LR 391 and R v Campbell [1991] 93 Cr App R 137 further clarified the principles from R v Jones, stating the need to assess all the defendant’s actions to decide if they crossed from preparation to attempt. R v Geddes noted the importance of acts directly connected to the intended offense, not just preparation.

Practical Effects for Legal Practice

R v Jones provides key guidance for legal professionals in attempt cases. For prosecutors, it shows the need to prove the defendant’s acts were more than preparation. For defense lawyers, it offers ways to challenge evidence if acts could be seen as preparation.

Conclusion

R v Jones is a major reference on attempt law, outlining when actions move from preparation to punishable attempt. The judgment’s focus on acts being "more than preparation," while requiring jury evaluation, sets a basis for assessing how close a defendant’s actions were to the intended crime. This case, along with later decisions like R v Geddes and R v Campbell, continues to influence how attempt liability is understood and applied in English criminal law, ensuring the line between preparation and attempt remains clear, though dependent on case-specific facts. This approach prevents punishment for thoughts alone, limiting liability to acts showing a direct and clear step toward committing a crime. The lasting significance of R v Jones reflects its role in explaining a central principle of criminal law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal