Welcome

R v Kemp [1957] 1 QB 399

ResourcesR v Kemp [1957] 1 QB 399

Facts

  • Mr. Kemp struck his wife with a hammer while unaware of his actions.
  • He suffered from arteriosclerosis, a hardening of the arteries, leading to restricted blood flow to the brain.
  • The reduced blood flow caused Kemp to experience a brief loss of consciousness, resulting in involuntary behavior.
  • Medical evidence confirmed his condition and connected it to the assault on his wife.

Issues

  1. Whether arteriosclerosis qualifies as a "disease of the mind" under the M'Naghten Rules, such that it can support a defense of insanity.
  2. Whether the distinction between physical and psychological causes affects the application of the insanity defense.

Decision

  • The Court of Criminal Appeal upheld the trial judge’s finding that arteriosclerosis constituted a "disease of the mind" for legal purposes.
  • The court emphasized that the relevant factor is the effect on mental faculties, not the origin (physical or psychological) of the condition.
  • It was held that arteriosclerosis, despite being a physical ailment, impaired Kemp’s awareness and self-control sufficient to meet the legal test.
  • Lord Devlin stated that the law looks at the result (impairment of mental function), not the source (physical cause).
  • The definition of "disease of the mind" under the M'Naghten Rules centers on the condition’s impact on mental processes, regardless of medical classification.
  • Both physical and psychological conditions can be included if they disrupt normal mental function.
  • The legal test focuses on mental impairment and not strictly on medical diagnosis or origin.
  • The case distinguished internal medical conditions (e.g., arteriosclerosis) from external causes of automatism, such as drug-induced episodes.
  • Subsequent cases, including R v Sullivan [1984] AC 156 (epilepsy) and R v Quick [1973] QB 910 (external factors), have relied on this approach to classify disorders.

Conclusion

R v Kemp established that conditions impairing mental faculties—regardless of physical or psychological origin—may constitute a "disease of the mind" for the purposes of the insanity defense, shaping modern interpretation of criminal responsibility.

Assistant

How can I help you?
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode

Responses can be incorrect. Please double check.