R v Pitham and Hehl (1977) 65 Cr App R 45

Facts

  • Pitham and Hehl were charged with theft of furniture belonging to a victim.
  • While in custody for an unrelated matter, Pitham asserted that he could sell the victim's furniture.
  • The furniture remained in the victim's home and neither defendant physically handled or removed the items.
  • Pitham, without authority, offered to sell the goods as if he were the owner.
  • Hehl inspected the furniture and agreed to purchase it, treating the goods as transferable.
  • Both defendants were arrested and charged with theft based on conduct alleged to amount to appropriation of the victim's property.

Issues

  1. Whether offering to sell and agreeing to purchase goods, without physical handling or removal, constitutes "appropriation" under section 3(1) of the Theft Act 1968.
  2. Whether interfering with the owner’s proprietary rights, specifically the right of disposal, qualifies as "assuming the rights of the owner" under section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal upheld the convictions of both defendants for theft.
  • The court determined that offering to sell another's property without authority is sufficient to assume the owner's right of sale.
  • Appropriation was found to include acts beyond physical handling or removal, such as offering goods for sale.
  • Hehl’s inspection and agreement to buy further demonstrated assumption of proprietary rights.
  • Convictions stood even though the property remained in the victim’s premises and no possession had changed.

Legal Principles

  • Section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 defines theft as the dishonest appropriation of property belonging to another with intent to permanently deprive.
  • Section 3(1) clarifies that appropriation includes any assumption of the rights of the owner, not limited to physical taking or movement.
  • Theft may occur by purporting to dispose of goods as owner, even without physical contact.
  • The offence of theft protects proprietary rights beyond those recognized under common law trespass or conversion.
  • Appropriation can arise from assuming any proprietary right, such as the right to sell, even in the absence of direct physical interaction with the goods.

Conclusion

The court held that dishonestly offering to sell another’s property without authority, even without physical removal or handling, constitutes appropriation under the Theft Act 1968, as the assumption of any proprietary right is sufficient for theft.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal