R v Pittwood [1902] TLR 37

Facts

  • Pittwood was employed by a railway company as a gatekeeper, responsible for managing a level crossing.
  • His contractual duty required keeping the gate closed when trains were approaching to safeguard the public.
  • On the incident date, Pittwood opened the gate to let a cart cross but failed to close it afterward, leaving the crossing unsupervised while he took lunch.
  • As a result, another horse and cart attempted to cross and were struck by an oncoming train, leading to the death of the cart's driver.
  • Pittwood's failure to fulfill his contractual responsibility directly caused the fatal accident.

Issues

  1. Whether a contractual obligation can create a legal duty in criminal law, the breach of which by omission constitutes the actus reus for manslaughter.
  2. Whether Pittwood’s omission, arising from a breach of his employment contract, was sufficient in law to ground criminal liability for the resulting death.

Decision

  • The court found that Pittwood’s contractual duty as gatekeeper imposed a legal obligation to act for the safety of the public using the level crossing.
  • His omission—failing to close the gate—constituted a breach of this duty and directly caused the victim’s death.
  • The court held that such a failure to perform a contractual duty satisfied the actus reus requirement for manslaughter.
  • Pittwood was found criminally liable for manslaughter due to his omission in the context of a contractual obligation.

Legal Principles

  • A contractual duty can amount to a legal duty to act in criminal law; omission to perform such a duty may constitute actus reus.
  • When a contractual responsibility is directly connected to public safety, its breach can engage criminal as well as civil liability.
  • The scope of omission liability includes situations where the duty arises from employment agreements, particularly where failure to act may cause harm to others.
  • Not all omissions are criminal—liability arises only where a legal duty to act exists, such as from contract, statute, or specific relationships.

Conclusion

R v Pittwood established that breach of a contractual duty may form the actus reus for manslaughter where such failure directly causes death, cementing the principle that contractual obligations can found criminal as well as civil liability when public safety is involved.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal