R v Rook [1993] 2 All ER 955

Facts

  • The defendant, Rook, agreed with others to kill his wife as part of a joint criminal enterprise.
  • At the time of the planned crime, Rook did not attend the meeting where the killing was to occur.
  • Rook argued his absence constituted withdrawal from the joint plan.
  • The Court of Appeal considered whether his actions amounted to a sufficient withdrawal from the enterprise.

Issues

  1. What constitutes effective withdrawal from a joint criminal enterprise?
  2. Does simple absence from the scene or failing to participate constitute withdrawal?
  3. How must withdrawal be communicated, and to whom?
  4. At what point must withdrawal occur to serve as a defence against liability?

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal upheld Rook’s conviction, ruling that mere absence was insufficient for withdrawal.
  • Withdrawal requires unequivocal steps—either words or actions—demonstrating a firm decision to leave the enterprise.
  • Communication of withdrawal should remove any doubt about the defendant’s intention to withdraw.
  • The court held that the adequacy of withdrawal depends on factors such as the timing of communication, the method used, and whether the conduct effectively made the crime’s commission less likely.
  • The judgment clarified that the closer in time to the offence, the more direct and urgent the steps to withdraw must be.

Legal Principles

  • Withdrawal from a joint enterprise operates as a full defence to liability only if it is unequivocal and occurs before the crime is committed.
  • Passive non-participation or inaction does not amount to effective withdrawal; positive action is necessary.
  • The adequacy of withdrawal depends on communication method, timing, and the defendant's role in the planned offence.
  • Later cases have clarified that informing the police or otherwise making the crime impossible are accepted methods for effective withdrawal, though practical limits in communication may be considered.

Conclusion

R v Rook establishes that effective withdrawal from a joint enterprise must be clearly and timely communicated; passivity or failure to participate does not suffice. The standard set requires demonstrable, unequivocal actions evidencing intent to depart from the joint plan, assessed according to the particular facts and circumstances of each case.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal