R v Smith [1959] 2 QB 35

Facts

  • The defendant, a soldier, stabbed another soldier during an altercation at an army barracks.
  • The victim was being carried to a medical facility but was dropped twice during transport.
  • Upon arrival, the victim received negligent medical treatment; the medical staff failed to recognize a punctured lung.
  • The victim died from his injuries.
  • The issue arose as to whether the negligent treatment constituted a novus actus interveniens (intervening act) that broke the chain of causation between the stabbing and the death.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant’s act of stabbing remained an operating and substantial cause of the victim’s death despite the subsequent negligent medical treatment.
  2. Whether the medical negligence was sufficient to break the chain of causation, thereby absolving the defendant of criminal liability.
  3. What threshold must be met for an intervening act to sever the chain of causation in criminal law.

Decision

  • The court held that the defendant’s act was still an operating and substantial cause of death.
  • The negligent medical treatment was not so overwhelming as to break the causal chain.
  • The original stab wound remained a significant contributing cause of death, and criminal liability was upheld.
  • The chain of causation will only be broken if the intervening act is so significant that the original act becomes merely part of the history.

Legal Principles

  • For criminal liability, the defendant’s conduct must be an operating and substantial cause of the harm; it need not be the sole or even the main cause.
  • Medical negligence does not break the chain of causation unless it is so overwhelming that the original act becomes insignificant in causing death.
  • A novus actus interveniens must be an unwarranted and extraneous event which completely eclipses the defendant’s contribution for the causal link to be severed.
  • Mere negligence or reasonably foreseeable complications from medical care will not normally constitute a novus actus interveniens.

Conclusion

R v Smith [1959] 2 QB 35 confirms that criminal liability remains when the defendant’s conduct is an operating and substantial cause of the result, and subsequent negligent medical treatment will not break the chain of causation unless it is extraordinarily egregious and overwhelming in effect.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal