Re Cavendish Browne [1916] WN 34

Facts

  • The case concerned interpretation and enforcement of restrictive covenants within a trust deed.
  • A third party had acquired property subject to the covenant initially created under the trust deed.
  • The dispute centered on whether the restrictive covenant could be enforced against the third party and the trustees' obligations in enforcing it.
  • The case was adjudicated by the Chancery Division and addressed issues involving both beneficiaries and trustees regarding administration of the trust.

Issues

  1. Whether a restrictive covenant in a trust deed may be enforced against a third party who acquires the property subject to that covenant.
  2. Whether the trustee has a fiduciary duty to enforce the terms of the covenant for the benefit of the beneficiaries.
  3. What legal remedies are available to beneficiaries when trustees fail to uphold trust obligations.

Decision

  • The court determined that restrictive covenants, while generally personal, may create proprietary interests which can bind third parties in specific circumstances.
  • The restrictive covenant in question was interpreted as running with the land, creating obligations enforceable against subsequent owners.
  • Trustees were found to have a fiduciary obligation to uphold and enforce the terms of the trust deed in the interests of the beneficiaries.
  • Legal remedies such as injunctions and damages may be available to beneficiaries against trustees failing in their duties.
  • The court emphasized the importance of giving effect to the intentions of the parties as expressed in the trust deed.

Legal Principles

  • Restrictive covenants in trust deeds can create proprietary interests, thereby binding third parties when intended to run with the land.
  • Trustees hold a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of beneficiaries and to follow explicitly the terms of trust instruments.
  • Equitable doctrines, including "equity regards as done that which ought to be done," can extend the enforceability of such covenants beyond strict privity of contract.
  • The drafting and clarity of trust instruments are fundamental to the determination and enforceability of trustee obligations.

Conclusion

Re Cavendish Browne [1916] WN 34 confirmed that restrictive covenants may be enforceable against third parties when they create proprietary interests and highlighted trustees’ fiduciary duties to uphold trust terms; the case remains significant for its clarification of the intersection between trust law and property rights.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal