Re Kayford Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 279

Facts

  • Kayford Ltd operated as a mail-order company, accepting payments from customers for goods to be delivered in the future.
  • Facing financial difficulties, the company’s directors placed customer funds into a separate bank account labeled "Customers' Trust Deposit Account" to protect those monies.
  • Kayford Ltd subsequently entered liquidation.
  • The liquidator asserted that the segregated funds should be distributed among all the company’s general creditors.
  • Customers maintained the segregated funds were held on trust for them and should not form part of the company’s general assets.
  • The court had to determine whether the steps taken by the company created a valid trust over these customer payments.

Issues

  1. Whether the segregation of customer payments into a separate account and labeling it as a trust account demonstrated a sufficient intention to create a trust.
  2. Whether the funds in the segregated account were held on trust for customers or formed part of Kayford Ltd’s general assets available to creditors in liquidation.
  3. What requirements are necessary for the establishment of a Quistclose trust in commercial transactions such as mail-order companies.

Decision

  • The court found that Kayford Ltd’s directors’ decision to open a separate account and label it as a trust account evidenced a clear intention to create a trust over the customer funds.
  • Segregation of the funds from the company’s general assets constituted a key step to establishing the trust.
  • The funds were received for a specific purpose (supply of goods), and their protection via segregation was adequate to prevent their use for other purposes.
  • No formalities beyond clear intention and segregation were required to establish the trust.
  • The customer funds in the dedicated account were held on trust for the customers and did not form part of the company’s assets available to creditors in the insolvency.

Legal Principles

  • A Quistclose trust arises when funds are advanced for a specific purpose: if that purpose fails, the funds are held on trust for the person advancing them.
  • Essential elements for a Quistclose trust include a defined purpose for the funds, an intention to create a trust, and appropriate segregation from general assets.
  • The court accepted that such a trust could be established informally where intention and segregation are sufficiently demonstrated.
  • The judgment affirmed and extended the application of Quistclose principles to customer payments in commercial settings, providing a means to safeguard such funds upon insolvency.

Conclusion

The court held that Kayford Ltd’s segregation of customer funds and the intention to protect them were sufficient to create a trust, meaning those monies were not part of the company’s general assets and were to be returned to customers, marking an important expansion of Quistclose trust principles to consumer transactions in commercial insolvency contexts.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal