Re Produce Marketing Consortium Ltd [1989] BCLC 520

Facts

  • The case concerned the duties of directors in circumstances where a company is insolvent or approaching insolvency.
  • It addressed the legal position when a company was experiencing financial distress, ongoing trading losses, inability to meet financial obligations, or reliance on external funding.
  • The judgment highlighted the shift from prioritising shareholder interests to focusing on creditor interests as a company's financial state worsens.
  • Directors' management of company affairs during this "twilight zone" of financial distress was central to the case.

Issues

  1. When does the duty of directors to consider the interests of creditors arise?
  2. How should directors define and identify the point at which a company is "near insolvency"?
  3. What are the consequences for directors who fail to consider creditor interests during severe financial difficulty?

Decision

  • The court held that the duty to consider creditors' interests arises when a company becomes insolvent or is on the verge of insolvency.
  • Directors cannot prioritise shareholders’ interests over creditors’ interests once insolvency or near-insolvency is apparent.
  • Directors must thoroughly review transactions and company decisions during financial distress to avoid prejudice to creditor claims.
  • Directors may face personal liability if their failure to observe these duties causes loss to creditors.

Legal Principles

  • Directors’ duties shift toward the interests of creditors as soon as insolvency or near insolvency is impending.
  • No fixed definition of "near insolvency" exists; several indicators—including trading losses and inability to meet obligations—are relevant.
  • Directors must undertake an objective assessment of the company’s financial status, considering both current and future cash flows.
  • Failure to consider creditor interests may expose directors to personal liability, especially regarding wrongful trading under later legislation (Section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986).
  • The case established a foundational precedent followed and developed by later insolvency decisions.

Conclusion

Re Produce Marketing Consortium Ltd [1989] BCLC 520 established that directors must consider the interests of creditors once a company is insolvent or nearly insolvent, with personal liability possible for disregard of these duties, providing essential guidance on directors' responsibilities during financial distress.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal