Re Shaw [1957] 1 WLR 729

Facts

  • George Bernard Shaw's will directed that part of his estate be used to research, develop, and publicize a new phonetic alphabet, aiming to improve literacy and communication.
  • The trustees were instructed to pursue the creation and dissemination of this new logical and simplified alphabet.
  • The executors applied to the court to determine whether this trust was charitable and valid.
  • The primary legal question was whether the purpose of developing a new alphabet satisfied the requirements for the advancement of education under English charitable trust law.

Issues

  1. Whether a trust for the development and publicity of a new alphabet constitutes a valid charitable trust as the advancement of education.
  2. Whether unconventional or experimental educational objectives can meet the criteria of certainty and public benefit required by charity law.
  3. Whether the proposed trust provided a sufficiently clear and practical educational benefit to be recognized as charitable.

Decision

  • The court found that the creation of a new alphabet was too speculative and uncertain to be classified as the advancement of education for charitable purposes.
  • It was determined that the trust lacked the necessary certainty and public benefit required by law for charitable trusts.
  • The trust established by Shaw's will was held to be invalid as a charitable purpose because the objective was not concretely tied to recognized educational outcomes.

Legal Principles

  • Charitable trusts must fall within recognized heads of charity, including the advancement of education, and must offer a public benefit.
  • The advancement of education extends to a broad range of activities, but those activities must have clear, certain, and concrete educational outcomes.
  • Trusts for experimental or speculative purposes may fail if they lack sufficient connection to educational benefit and fail the requirement of certainty.
  • Judicial willingness to recognize unconventional charitable purposes is limited by the need for definite public and educational benefit.

Conclusion

The trust established by George Bernard Shaw for the development of a new alphabet was held not to be a valid charitable trust, as its speculative and uncertain nature failed to satisfy the legal requirements for advancing education and public benefit.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal