## Facts

- George Bernard Shaw's will directed that part of his estate be used to research, develop, and publicize a new phonetic alphabet, aiming to improve literacy and communication.
- The trustees were instructed to pursue the creation and dissemination of this new logical and simplified alphabet.
- The executors applied to the court to determine whether this trust was charitable and valid.
- The primary legal question was whether the purpose of developing a new alphabet satisfied the requirements for the advancement of education under English charitable trust law.

## Issues

1. Whether a trust for the development and publicity of a new alphabet constitutes a valid charitable trust as the advancement of education.
2. Whether unconventional or experimental educational objectives can meet the criteria of certainty and public benefit required by charity law.
3. Whether the proposed trust provided a sufficiently clear and practical educational benefit to be recognized as charitable.

## Decision

- The court found that the creation of a new alphabet was too speculative and uncertain to be classified as the advancement of education for charitable purposes.
- It was determined that the trust lacked the necessary certainty and public benefit required by law for charitable trusts.
- The trust established by Shaw's will was held to be invalid as a charitable purpose because the objective was not concretely tied to recognized educational outcomes.

## Legal Principles

- Charitable trusts must fall within recognized heads of charity, including the advancement of education, and must offer a public benefit.
- The advancement of education extends to a broad range of activities, but those activities must have clear, certain, and concrete educational outcomes.
- Trusts for experimental or speculative purposes may fail if they lack sufficient connection to educational benefit and fail the requirement of certainty.
- Judicial willingness to recognize unconventional charitable purposes is limited by the need for definite public and educational benefit.

## Conclusion

The trust established by George Bernard Shaw for the development of a new alphabet was held not to be a valid charitable trust, as its speculative and uncertain nature failed to satisfy the legal requirements for advancing education and public benefit.

Re Shaw [1957] 1 WLR 729