## Facts

- After Hurricane Katrina and the disruption of city operations, the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD) terminated or disciplined multiple NOPD officers, including Rashi Reed, for alleged misconduct such as abandonment of duty or failure to report.
- The officers were permanent classified civil servants who generally possessed a protected property interest in continued employment.
- The NOPD imposed the discipline without providing the pre-termination hearing contemplated by New Orleans Civil Service Commission (CSC) Rule IX, § 1.2.
- The officers appealed to the CSC.
- The CSC reversed the dismissals, ruling the discipline “illegal” solely because the NOPD did not provide pre-termination hearings required by the CSC rule, and it granted relief (including reinstatement) without deciding whether the NOPD had cause on the facts of each case.
- The Department of Police appealed. The Louisiana Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, consolidated the matters only to decide the shared legal question: whether the CSC committed legal error by treating the absence of pre-termination hearings as automatically invalidating the discipline.
- The appellate court considered the emergency conditions created by Hurricane Katrina and the availability of post-termination proceedings before the CSC.

## Issues

1. Under the extraordinary conditions created by Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath, did due process permit the NOPD to terminate officers without providing pre-termination hearings required by CSC Rule IX, § 1.2, if the officers received meaningful post-termination CSC hearings?

## Decision

- The court held that Hurricane Katrina and its effects on New Orleans and its government were an extraordinary event that could justify terminating or disciplining officers without pre-termination hearings.
- The court held that, under these unique circumstances, a meaningful post-termination hearing before the CSC—allowing an officer to present all relevant evidence that could overturn the NOPD’s decision—satisfied due process under the United States and Louisiana Constitutions.
- The court held that the CSC erred as a matter of law by declaring the discipline “illegal” solely because the NOPD did not provide pre-termination hearings.
- The court vacated the CSC decisions in the consolidated cases and remanded for the CSC to take any additional evidence needed and decide each case on the merits (including whether cause existed for the discipline).

## Legal Principles

- Public employees with a protected property interest in continued employment generally must receive notice and an opportunity to respond before termination, but due process is flexible and depends on the circumstances.
- In emergency circumstances, a valid governmental interest may justify action before a hearing, with procedural protection supplied after the deprivation.
- A post-termination proceeding can satisfy due process when it is meaningful and gives the employee a full opportunity to present evidence and challenge the employer’s stated reasons.
- When reviewing discipline, a civil service commission must decide the merits (including whether the appointing authority had cause) and may not invalidate discipline solely because a pre-termination hearing did not occur, where the constitution permits post-termination process in light of the emergency.

## Conclusion

Reed held that the Katrina emergency could excuse the NOPD’s failure to provide pre-termination hearings, so long as officers received meaningful post-termination hearings before the CSC; because the CSC reversed discipline solely on the missing pre-termination hearings and did not reach the merits, the court vacated and remanded for decisions on cause and the facts of each case.


Reed v. Department of Police, 967 So. 2d 606 (2007)