## Facts

- Regency Villas owned a timeshare complex.
- The timeshare owners claimed the right, under a transfer deed, to use sports and leisure facilities—including a swimming pool, golf course, and tennis courts—located on adjacent land owned by Diamond Resorts.
- Diamond Resorts disputed that these rights were easements, contending they were personal licenses benefiting the individual timeshare users rather than the property itself.

## Issues

1. Whether rights to use leisure and sports facilities can qualify as legal easements benefiting land rather than merely constituting personal rights or licences.
2. Whether the rights claimed by Regency Villas served the dominant land, fulfilling the legal requirements for the recognition of an easement.

## Decision

- The Supreme Court held that rights to use leisure and sports facilities can, in principle, amount to easements.
- It was determined that the rights in question benefited the timeshare land as they supported its primary use for leisure and increased its utility and attractiveness.
- The Court found that these rights attached to the land itself and were not merely personal to the timeshare owners.
- The Supreme Court concluded the criteria for valid easements were met, and thus, the rights constituted easements rather than mere licences.

## Legal Principles

- An easement must benefit the dominant tenement and be linked to the ordinary use and utility of the benefited land.
- The dominant and servient tenements must be distinct and separately owned.
- The subject matter of the easement must be sufficiently definite, not overly broad, and not impose an excessive burden on the servient land.
- The right must attach to the land itself and not simply to its current occupants.
- Recreational and leisure rights can qualify as easements when they improve the land’s utility and value in accordance with its intended purpose.

## Conclusion

The Supreme Court in Regency Villas clarified that properly structured recreational and leisure rights can constitute enforceable easements if they benefit land, establishing clearer criteria for such rights within property law.

Regency Villas Ltd v Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd [2018] UKSC 57