Rodway v Landy [2001] Ch 703

Facts

  • The case concerned two doctors who jointly owned property used as a medical practice.
  • Disputes arose regarding the use and division of the shared premises.
  • Physical partition of the property would have disrupted its functionality for both doctors’ work.
  • Proceedings were brought to determine whether an occupation order or partition was the appropriate remedy under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA).
  • The lower court granted an occupation order, and this was appealed.

Issues

  1. Whether courts should favour partition or occupation orders in resolving disputes under TOLATA where physical division of property is impractical.
  2. The extent to which courts should consider section 15 TOLATA factors when making orders about the use or partition of jointly owned land.
  3. Whether practicality and the parties’ particular circumstances should guide the decision between partition and occupation.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal upheld the occupation order, confirming it as an appropriate remedy where physical division would harm the co-owners’ use of the property.
  • It was held that partition is no longer the automatic or preferred solution under TOLATA.
  • The court emphasised that section 15 requires balancing all relevant factors rather than giving overriding weight to any one consideration.
  • Practical outcomes and the real interests of parties are to guide the court’s approach to co-ownership disputes.
  • Section 14 of TOLATA grants courts broad discretion to make orders regarding jointly owned land, including for partition or occupation.
  • Section 15 sets out factors courts must consider: the trust’s purpose, intended use of the property, children’s needs, and creditors’ interests.
  • Courts should favour remedies that are workable and fair, with partition ordered only where suitable and not as the default.
  • Occupation orders may be used where physical division of property is unworkable or detrimental.
  • Judicial flexibility, with fact-sensitive analysis, underpins use of the TOLATA framework in property disputes.

Conclusion

Rodway v Landy established that TOLATA 1996 requires courts to prioritise practical and fair solutions in co-ownership disputes, weighing all section 15 factors and permitting occupation orders where partition is not feasible, thereby shaping modern property law approaches to shared ownership.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal