Shadwell v Shadwell (1860) 9 CB NS 159

Facts

  • The defendant (uncle) promised to pay the plaintiff (nephew) an annual sum of £150 until the nephew’s income reached 600 guineas per annum.
  • This promise was contingent upon the nephew marrying his fiancée.
  • The nephew married his fiancée, thus fulfilling the condition, and the uncle paid the promised sum for a period.
  • Upon the uncle's death, the payments ceased, prompting the nephew to bring legal action against the uncle’s estate for the unpaid sums.
  • The uncle’s estate argued that the nephew provided no valid consideration since the marriage contract was between the nephew and his fiancée, not with the uncle.

Issues

  1. Whether the performance of a pre-existing contractual duty owed to a third party (the marriage to the fiancée) can constitute valid consideration for a promise made by another party (the uncle).
  2. Whether the uncle's promise was enforceable or amounted merely to a voluntary gift due to lack of direct consideration.

Decision

  • The court held that the nephew’s marriage to his fiancée constituted valid consideration for the uncle’s promise, despite the duty being owed to a third party, not the uncle.
  • It was determined that the uncle’s promise acted as an inducement for the nephew to marry, resulting in a detriment to the nephew and a potential benefit to the uncle.
  • The judgment recognized that detriment to the promisee or benefit to the promisor arising from actions performed under a third-party contract could suffice for consideration.
  • The uncle’s estate was held liable for the remaining promised payments.

Legal Principles

  • Performance of a pre-existing contractual obligation owed to a third party can amount to valid consideration for a new promise.
  • Consideration may consist of detriment to the promisee or benefit to the promisor, even if stemming from obligations relating to a third party.
  • The courts adopted a flexible approach to the doctrine of consideration, broadening its scope beyond direct exchanges between the immediate parties.

Conclusion

Shadwell v Shadwell established that a party's fulfilment of a pre-existing duty to a third party can constitute sufficient consideration for a separate contract, thereby expanding the traditional boundaries of consideration within English contract law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal