## Facts

- Cox Brothers & Co Ltd's articles of association originally named four permanent directors, including Mr. Shuttleworth.
- The company proposed and passed a change to its articles permitting the other directors to remove Mr. Shuttleworth at their discretion.
- Following the amendment, Mr. Shuttleworth was dismissed under the new provision.
- Mr. Shuttleworth challenged the amendment, alleging it was unfairly directed at him.

## Issues

1. Whether a company may lawfully amend its articles of association in a manner that facilitates the removal of a specific director.
2. Whether courts may intervene if an amendment is alleged to have been made for improper, unfair, or targeted reasons.
3. What standard the court should use to assess the legitimacy of such amendments.

## Decision

- The Court of Appeal upheld the validity of the amended articles.
- It held that companies have broad authority to alter articles, provided the power is exercised bona fide for the benefit of the company as a whole.
- The court clarified its review is limited to whether the change was made honestly for the company's benefit, not whether it was reasonable or produced particular outcomes.
- If shareholders act with truthful intent within lawful boundaries, courts will not overturn their decisions even if individuals are adversely affected.

## Legal Principles

- The "bona fide for the benefit of the company" test requires shareholders to act honestly, focusing on the perceived advantage to the company rather than the actual effects or reasonableness of the amendment.
- The court's function is not to assess the substantive merits of article changes but to determine whether statutory procedures and bona fide intentions are satisfied.
- Majority shareholder authority is strongly protected, with court intervention reserved for cases involving dishonesty or improper motive.
- The case reinforces that amendments must not be capricious or unjust, but the primary standard is bona fide shareholder belief in benefit to the company.

## Conclusion

Shuttleworth v Cox Bros & Co Ltd confirms that company article amendments are valid if made in good faith for the company's benefit, limiting courts to reviewing the genuineness of shareholder intent rather than the merits of the decision, thus upholding shareholder primacy and restricting judicial intervention in internal company matters.


Shuttleworth v Cox Bros & Co Ltd [1927] 2 KB 9