Shuttleworth v Cox Bros & Co Ltd [1927] 2 KB 9

Facts

  • Cox Brothers & Co Ltd's articles of association originally named four permanent directors, including Mr. Shuttleworth.
  • The company proposed and passed a change to its articles permitting the other directors to remove Mr. Shuttleworth at their discretion.
  • Following the amendment, Mr. Shuttleworth was dismissed under the new provision.
  • Mr. Shuttleworth challenged the amendment, alleging it was unfairly directed at him.

Issues

  1. Whether a company may lawfully amend its articles of association in a manner that facilitates the removal of a specific director.
  2. Whether courts may intervene if an amendment is alleged to have been made for improper, unfair, or targeted reasons.
  3. What standard the court should use to assess the legitimacy of such amendments.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal upheld the validity of the amended articles.
  • It held that companies have broad authority to alter articles, provided the power is exercised bona fide for the benefit of the company as a whole.
  • The court clarified its review is limited to whether the change was made honestly for the company's benefit, not whether it was reasonable or produced particular outcomes.
  • If shareholders act with truthful intent within lawful boundaries, courts will not overturn their decisions even if individuals are adversely affected.

Legal Principles

  • The "bona fide for the benefit of the company" test requires shareholders to act honestly, focusing on the perceived advantage to the company rather than the actual effects or reasonableness of the amendment.
  • The court's function is not to assess the substantive merits of article changes but to determine whether statutory procedures and bona fide intentions are satisfied.
  • Majority shareholder authority is strongly protected, with court intervention reserved for cases involving dishonesty or improper motive.
  • The case reinforces that amendments must not be capricious or unjust, but the primary standard is bona fide shareholder belief in benefit to the company.

Conclusion

Shuttleworth v Cox Bros & Co Ltd confirms that company article amendments are valid if made in good faith for the company's benefit, limiting courts to reviewing the genuineness of shareholder intent rather than the merits of the decision, thus upholding shareholder primacy and restricting judicial intervention in internal company matters.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal