Spencer v Harding (1870) LR 5 CP 561

Facts

  • The defendant, Harding, circulated a document inviting tenders for the purchase of goods, specifying the type and quantity available.
  • The circular did not state that Harding would sell to the highest bidder, nor to any bidder.
  • The claimant, Spencer, submitted the highest tender.
  • Despite being the highest bidder, Spencer’s tender was declined by Harding.
  • Spencer claimed that Harding’s circular was an offer to sell to the highest bidder, forming a contract upon submission of the tender.
  • The dispute focused on whether Harding’s invitation constituted a unilateral offer or was merely a solicitation of offers.

Issues

  1. Whether the circular inviting tenders constituted a legally binding offer to sell to the highest bidder.
  2. Whether a contract was formed by Spencer’s submission of the highest tender in response to the circular.
  3. Whether the absence of express commitment in the invitation rendered it an invitation to treat rather than an offer.

Decision

  • The Court of Common Pleas held that Harding was not contractually obliged to sell the goods to Spencer.
  • The circular was classified as an invitation to treat, not an offer.
  • Binding contractual obligations would only arise if the circular expressly indicated an intent to be bound by accepting the highest bid.
  • No contract was formed as Harding had not accepted any offer.

Legal Principles

  • An invitation to tender is generally regarded as an invitation to treat, not as an offer.
  • Only the acceptance of an offer (not a preliminary invitation) creates a binding contract.
  • Explicit language is required in an invitation to indicate willingness to be bound by the highest or any tender.
  • The principle protects parties issuing tenders from unintended contractual obligations.
  • There are exceptions to the general rule, as in cases where circumstances—such as a specified process or obligation to consider timely bids—may create an implied contract (e.g., Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool BC).

Conclusion

Spencer v Harding established that a general invitation to tender, without clear language of intent to be bound, is an invitation to treat and not an offer, so no contract arises unless the party issuing the invitation explicitly undertakes to accept the highest or any tender received.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal