Learning Outcomes
This article explains the nature and effect of judgments in civil litigation. It covers the key components of a typical money judgment, including liability, quantum, interest, and costs. It also outlines the principles of finality (res judicata and estoppel), the methods available for enforcing judgments, and the concept of judicial precedent. Understanding these elements is essential for advising clients on the potential outcomes and consequences of litigation in the SQE1 assessment context.
SQE1 Syllabus
For SQE1, candidates must understand the practical implications of judgments in civil proceedings. This includes the components of a judgment and its effect on the parties and the wider legal system. A thorough understanding of these topics is necessary to apply the relevant legal principles effectively in multiple-choice questions.
Revision should focus on:
- The determination of liability following a trial.
- The assessment of quantum, including different types of damages.
- The principles governing the award of interest on judgments.
- The rules and discretion concerning costs orders.
- The concept of finality through res judicata and issue estoppel.
- The main methods of enforcing money judgments.
- The doctrine of precedent and its operation within the court hierarchy.
Test Your Knowledge
Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.
-
Which component of a judgment refers to the amount of financial compensation awarded?
- Liability
- Quantum
- Interest
- Costs
-
Which doctrine prevents a party from re-litigating issues already decided in previous proceedings between the same parties?
- Stare decisis
- Ratio decidendi
- Res judicata
- Obiter dicta
-
Which of the following enforcement methods involves seizing and selling the judgment debtor's assets?
- Third party debt order
- Charging order
- Attachment of earnings order
- Taking control of goods
-
True or false? The part of a judgment containing the legal reasoning essential for the decision is known as obiter dicta.
Introduction
Following the conclusion of a civil trial, the judge delivers a judgment. This represents the court's formal decision on the matters in dispute between the parties. For SQE1, it is essential to understand both the components that make up a judgment and the legal effects that flow from it. A judgment not only resolves the specific dispute but can also have wider implications, such as setting a precedent for future cases or necessitating enforcement action if not complied with voluntarily.
The Nature of Civil Judgments
A civil judgment typically addresses several key aspects of the dispute, determining the rights and liabilities of the parties involved. In a money claim, the main components are liability, quantum, interest, and costs.
Liability
The first element the court determines is liability. This involves deciding which party's version of events is proven on the balance of probabilities and applying the relevant legal principles to those facts. The judge assesses whether the claimant has established the necessary elements of their cause of action (e.g., duty, breach, causation, and loss in negligence) or whether the defendant has successfully established a defence. The finding on liability dictates whether the claimant is entitled to a remedy.
Quantum (Damages)
If liability is established in favour of the claimant in a money claim, the court must then determine the quantum – the amount of damages to be awarded.
Key Term: Quantum
The amount of money awarded by the court as compensation for the loss or damage suffered by the successful claimant.
The assessment of quantum aims to put the claimant back in the position they would have been in had the wrong not occurred (in tort) or had the contract been performed (in contract). This involves calculating both:
- Special damages: Quantifiable financial losses incurred up to the date of trial (e.g., lost earnings, medical expenses, repair costs). These must be specifically pleaded and proven.
- General damages: Compensation for non-quantifiable losses, such as pain, suffering, and loss of amenity in personal injury claims, or damages for distress where appropriate. These are assessed by the judge based on precedent and guidelines.
Interest
A successful claimant is usually entitled to interest on the damages awarded. Interest compensates the claimant for being kept out of their money between the time the loss was suffered and the date of judgment. The court has discretion regarding the rate and period for which interest is awarded, guided by statutory provisions like the Senior Courts Act 1981 or the County Courts Act 1984. Specific rules may also apply, such as under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 for commercial debts. Interest may also be awarded on the judgment debt itself from the date of judgment until payment.
Key Term: Interest
An additional sum awarded on damages or debts to compensate the claimant for the delay in receiving payment.
Costs
Costs refer to the legal expenses incurred by the parties in pursuing or defending the litigation, including solicitors' fees, court fees, expert witness fees, and barristers' fees. The general rule (CPR 44.2) is that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the successful party's costs ('costs follow the event'). However, the court retains discretion and can make different orders based on factors such as the parties' conduct, any admissible offers to settle (including Part 36 offers), and the degree of success on different issues. Costs can be assessed on the standard basis (allowing only proportionate costs) or the indemnity basis (a more generous assessment, often ordered as a penalty for unreasonable conduct).
Key Term: Costs
The legal expenses incurred by parties during litigation, which the court may order one party to pay to the other.
The Effect of Civil Judgments
A judgment has several important legal effects, extending beyond the immediate resolution of the dispute for the parties involved.
Finality: Res Judicata and Estoppel
A fundamental principle is that judgments are final and binding between the parties. This is underpinned by the doctrine of res judicata, which prevents the same claim or issue being re-litigated.
Key Term: Res Judicata
A legal doctrine meaning 'a matter decided', which prevents the re-litigation of claims or issues that have already been determined by a court between the same parties.
Res judicata encompasses two main forms of estoppel:
- Cause of action estoppel: Prevents a party from bringing a subsequent claim based on the same cause of action that has already been decided.
- Issue estoppel: Prevents a party from re-arguing a specific issue of fact or law that was essential to the decision in a previous case between the same parties, even if the subsequent claim involves a different cause of action.
These principles ensure certainty and prevent parties from being subjected to repeated litigation over the same matters.
Key Term: Issue Estoppel
A form of res judicata preventing a party from re-litigating a specific issue previously decided by a court in earlier proceedings between the same parties.
Enforcement of Judgments
A judgment creates a legal obligation. If the unsuccessful party (the judgment debtor) fails to comply voluntarily (e.g., by paying the sum awarded), the successful party (the judgment creditor) can take steps to enforce the judgment.
Key Term: Enforcement
The legal process by which a judgment creditor compels a judgment debtor to comply with the terms of a court judgment, typically involving the recovery of money owed.
Various methods of enforcement are available for money judgments, including:
- Taking control of goods (previously writ/warrant of execution)
- Third party debt orders (attaching funds owed to the debtor by a third party, like a bank)
- Charging orders (securing the debt against the debtor's property)
- Attachment of earnings orders (deductions from the debtor's salary)
The appropriate method depends on the debtor's assets and circumstances. Enforcement ensures that judgments have practical effect and provide a meaningful remedy.
Worked Example 1.1
Scenario: Clara obtained a judgment against David for £15,000 following a successful breach of contract claim. David has failed to pay. Clara knows David is employed full-time and owns a car, but has no property. Which enforcement method might be most suitable for Clara?
Answer: Clara could consider an attachment of earnings order given David's employment, which would deduct payments directly from his salary. Alternatively, if the car has sufficient value and is not essential for David's basic needs or work, she could apply for an order taking control of goods to seize and sell the car. A third party debt order or charging order would be unsuitable as David has no known significant bank savings or property.
Precedent
Judgments, particularly those from higher courts, contribute to the development of case law through the doctrine of precedent (stare decisis).
Key Term: Precedent
The principle that courts are bound by the legal decisions of higher courts in previous cases involving similar facts or points of law. Also known as stare decisis.
The binding part of a judgment is the ratio decidendi – the legal principle or reason essential for the decision based on the material facts.
Key Term: Ratio Decidendi
The legal reasoning or principle forming the basis of a court's decision, which is binding as precedent on lower courts.
Other statements made by the judge that are not essential to the decision are known as obiter dicta. These are not binding but may be persuasive in future cases.
Key Term: Obiter Dicta
Statements made by a judge in a judgment that are not essential to the decision and therefore do not form part of the binding precedent, but may be considered persuasive.
The hierarchy of the courts dictates the application of precedent:
- The Supreme Court binds all lower courts but is not strictly bound by its own previous decisions.
- The Court of Appeal binds all lower courts and itself (subject to limited exceptions).
- The High Court binds lower courts (County Court, Magistrates' Court) but not itself (though High Court judges usually follow previous High Court decisions for consistency).
Worked Example 1.2
Scenario: The Court of Appeal delivers a judgment interpreting a specific clause in a standard form commercial contract. A later case involving the same clause comes before the High Court. Is the High Court judge bound by the Court of Appeal's interpretation?
Answer: Yes, the High Court judge is bound by the Court of Appeal's decision due to the doctrine of precedent. The Court of Appeal is higher in the court hierarchy than the High Court. The judge must apply the ratio decidendi (the reasoning behind the interpretation of the clause) from the Court of Appeal case.
Revision Tip
When analysing judgments for revision, focus on identifying the ratio decidendi. Understanding the difference between the binding ratio and persuasive obiter dicta is critical for applying case law correctly in problem questions. Consider the court hierarchy when determining the precedential value of a case.
Key Point Checklist
This article has covered the following key knowledge points:
- Civil judgments determine liability based on evidence and legal principles.
- Quantum refers to the assessment of damages (special and general) awarded to compensate for loss.
- Interest is typically awarded on damages to account for the delay in payment.
- Costs orders allocate the legal expenses of litigation, usually requiring the loser to pay the winner's costs, subject to court discretion.
- Judgments are generally final due to res judicata, preventing re-litigation of the same claims (cause of action estoppel) or issues (issue estoppel).
- Successful parties can use various methods (e.g., taking control of goods, charging orders) to enforce unpaid money judgments.
- Judgments from higher courts create binding precedent (ratio decidendi) for lower courts, ensuring legal consistency. Obiter dicta are persuasive but not binding.
Key Terms and Concepts
- Quantum
- Interest
- Costs
- Res Judicata
- Issue Estoppel
- Enforcement
- Precedent
- Ratio Decidendi
- Obiter Dicta
