Homicide offences - Involuntary manslaughter (unlawful act and gross negligence)

Learning Outcomes

After reading this article, you will be able to explain and apply the elements of involuntary manslaughter, including both unlawful act and gross negligence manslaughter. You will be able to distinguish between these offences, identify their actus reus and mens rea requirements, and analyse how the courts determine dangerousness, duty of care, breach, and causation. You will also be able to apply these principles to SQE1-style scenarios and avoid common pitfalls.

SQE1 Syllabus

For SQE1, you are required to understand involuntary manslaughter as a key homicide offence. Focus your revision on:

  • the elements of unlawful act manslaughter (constructive manslaughter)
  • the elements of gross negligence manslaughter
  • the distinction between unlawful act and gross negligence manslaughter
  • the requirements for dangerousness, duty of care, breach, causation, and grossness
  • how the courts assess risk of death and the role of omissions
  • applying these rules to practical scenarios and avoiding common errors

Test Your Knowledge

Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.

  1. Which of the following is required for unlawful act manslaughter?
    1. a civil wrong
    2. a dangerous and unlawful act
    3. an omission
    4. proof of intention to kill
  2. Which of the following is NOT an element of gross negligence manslaughter?
    1. a duty of care owed to the victim
    2. a breach of that duty
    3. intention to cause serious harm
    4. a risk of death that was obvious
  3. True or false? For unlawful act manslaughter, the defendant must foresee the risk of death.

  4. In gross negligence manslaughter, who decides whether the breach was "gross"?

Introduction

Involuntary manslaughter covers unlawful killings where the defendant did not intend to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. For SQE1, you must know the two main types: unlawful act manslaughter (also called constructive manslaughter) and gross negligence manslaughter. Each has distinct requirements and is assessed differently by the courts. This article explains the elements, key terms, and practical application of both offences.

Unlawful Act Manslaughter

Unlawful act manslaughter occurs when a person intentionally does an unlawful and dangerous act that causes death, even if they did not intend harm. The prosecution must prove four elements:

  1. The defendant did a positive act (not an omission).
  2. The act was a criminal offence (not merely a civil wrong).
  3. The act was objectively dangerous.
  4. The act caused the victim’s death.

Key Term: unlawful act manslaughter
A form of involuntary manslaughter where death results from a defendant’s intentional, unlawful, and dangerous act.

Key Term: dangerous act
An act that all sober and reasonable people would recognise as subjecting another to the risk of some physical harm.

The Unlawful Act

The act must be a crime requiring a positive action. Omissions do not suffice. The principal offence can be any crime (e.g., assault, criminal damage, burglary), but not negligence or a civil wrong.

Dangerousness

The act must be dangerous as judged by the objective standard: would all sober and reasonable people recognise the risk of some harm? The defendant’s own awareness is irrelevant.

Causation

The unlawful act must cause the death, applying normal rules of factual and legal causation.

Worked Example 1.1

A group of friends throw stones at passing trains as a prank. One stone breaks a window, fatally injuring a passenger. Can the thrower be convicted of unlawful act manslaughter?

Answer: Yes. Throwing stones at a train is a criminal offence and a dangerous act. The act caused death. The defendant need not foresee death or serious harm.
Exam Warning
For unlawful act manslaughter, the act must be a crime and a positive act. Omissions, even if grossly negligent, cannot be the basis for this offence.

Worked Example 1.2

A defendant pushes someone during an argument. The victim falls, hits their head, and dies. The push was intended as a minor assault. Is this unlawful act manslaughter?

Answer: Yes. The push is a battery (a criminal offence), and pushing someone is objectively dangerous. The act caused death.

Gross Negligence Manslaughter

Gross negligence manslaughter arises when a person owes a duty of care to the victim, breaches that duty in a grossly negligent way, and causes death. The prosecution must prove:

  1. The defendant owed the victim a duty of care.
  2. The defendant breached that duty.
  3. The breach caused the death.
  4. The breach involved a serious and obvious risk of death.
  5. The breach was grossly negligent.

Key Term: gross negligence manslaughter
A form of involuntary manslaughter where death results from a defendant’s gross breach of a duty of care.

Key Term: duty of care
A legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which could foreseeably injure another.

Key Term: gross negligence
Conduct so far below the standard expected of a reasonable person that it amounts to a crime deserving punishment.

Duty of Care

The duty of care is assessed using civil law principles. It can arise from relationships (doctor-patient, employer-employee, parent-child), contracts, or creating a dangerous situation.

Breach and Risk

The defendant must breach the duty, and the breach must create a serious and obvious risk of death, not just injury.

Causation (Gross Negligence Manslaughter)

The breach must cause the death, applying normal causation rules.

Grossness

The breach must be so bad as to amount to a crime. The jury decides if the negligence is "gross."

Worked Example 1.3

A landlord ignores repeated complaints about a faulty gas boiler. The boiler leaks carbon monoxide, killing a tenant. Is this gross negligence manslaughter?

Answer: Yes. The landlord owed a duty of care, breached it, the breach caused death, the risk of death was obvious, and the conduct was grossly negligent.

Revision Tip

For gross negligence manslaughter, always check for a duty of care, a breach, causation, an obvious risk of death, and whether the breach is gross.

Comparing the Offences

FeatureUnlawful Act ManslaughterGross Negligence Manslaughter
Act requiredPositive criminal actAct or omission (if duty exists)
Principal offenceCrime (not civil wrong/negligence)Breach of duty of care
DangerousnessObjective test (risk of some harm)Objective test (risk of death)
Mens reaIntent to do the actNo intent required; gross negligence
OmissionsNot sufficientSufficient if duty exists
Who decides "gross"?N/AJury

Key Point Checklist

This article has covered the following key knowledge points:

  • Unlawful act manslaughter requires a positive, criminal, and dangerous act causing death.
  • The act must be objectively dangerous; the defendant’s awareness is irrelevant.
  • Gross negligence manslaughter requires a duty of care, breach, causation, serious risk of death, and grossness.
  • The jury decides whether negligence is "gross" in gross negligence manslaughter.
  • Omissions can only form the basis of gross negligence manslaughter, not unlawful act manslaughter.
  • For SQE1, be able to distinguish between the two offences and apply the correct elements to scenarios.

Key Terms and Concepts

  • unlawful act manslaughter
  • dangerous act
  • gross negligence manslaughter
  • duty of care
  • gross negligence
The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal