## Question 1 A lessee operating a café faces financial difficulties and decides to sublet a portion of the leased premises without the lessor's consent, violating the lease's clear prohibition against subletting without prior approval. The lessor learns of this unauthorized subletting during a routine visit. What is the most appropriate initial action for the lessor to take, considering the lease's provisions and general principles of leasehold covenants? - A. Demand eviction of the subtenant and the lessee from the premises immediately. - B. Serve a formal notice to the lessee to cease the unauthorized subletting and request remedy. - C. Immediately increase the rent as a penalty for breaching the lease terms. - D. Publicly list the property for lease to find a new tenant. - E. Apply to court for a declaration that the lease is forfeited due to breach.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is B. Serving a formal notice to the lessee to cease the unauthorized subletting and request remedy respects the procedural steps required before taking more severe actions. It provides the lessee with an opportunity to rectify the breach in accordance with the lease's terms and conditions. Option A is incorrect because immediate demands for eviction without following the due process might be unlawful and could potentially lead to legal action against the lessor. Option C is incorrect because the landlord cannot unilaterally increase the rent as a penalty without an agreement or specific provision within the lease allowing for such action in response to breaches. Option D is incorrect because publicly listing the property for lease assumes the termination of the current lease without following the proper legal process for addressing the breach. Option E is incorrect because applying to court for a declaration of forfeiture is typically a last resort after the lessee fails to remedy the breach following proper notice and within the given timeframe.

## Question 2 A beneficiary has recently acquired a substantial estate through a will, which includes a historical cottage and an exquisite collection of rare paintings. The beneficiary seeks advice to understand how these assets are categorized under property law in England and Wales. Under property law, how should the beneficiary's acquired assets be classified? - A. The historical cottage is considered personal property, and the rare paintings are real property. - B. Both the historical cottage and the rare paintings are considered real property. - C. Both the historical cottage and the rare paintings are considered personal property. - D. The historical cottage is considered real property, and the rare paintings are personal property. - E. The classification depends on the market value of the paintings and the land size of the cottage.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is D. Real property pertains to land and structures that are permanently affixed to the land, like the historical cottage. Personal property encompasses movable items, which in this case includes the collection of rare paintings. Option A is incorrect because the historical cottage is classified as real property due to its attachment to land, whereas the paintings, being movable, are classified as personal property. Option B is incorrect because the rare paintings do not constitute real property as they are not fixed or immovable assets like land or buildings. Option C is incorrect since the historical cottage, being attached to the land, qualifies it as real property, contrasting with the movable nature of the paintings which are personal property. Option E is incorrect because the classification of these assets under property law does not depend upon their market value or land size but rather on their fixed or movable nature.

## Question 3 A group of investors form a partnership to purchase and develop an eco-friendly residential property. They decide to hold the property in trust, with each partner having an equal share. The development is completed, and they now wish to create a formal agreement that outlines how decisions regarding the property, including potential future sale or further development, should be made among them. Under which legal framework should the trustees draft their agreement to ensure it appropriately governs their co-ownership and decision-making processes concerning the property? - A. The Law of Property Act 1925. - B. The Trustee Act 2000. - C. The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. - D. The Partnership Act 1890. - E. The Companies Act 2006.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is C. The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 is the most relevant legal framework for drafting an agreement among trustees who are co-owners of property. It specifically governs the management and operation of land held in trust, including the processes for making decisions regarding the property. Option A is incorrect because the Law of Property Act 1925 mainly deals with general property ownership and rights, not specifically co-owned trust property or the detailed governance of decision-making amongst trustees. Option B is incorrect as the Trustee Act 2000 primarily provides a framework for trustees' investment powers and duties, not the nuanced agreement of co-owned property management. Option D is incorrect because the Partnership Act 1890 governs the relations amongst partners in a business partnership, not the specific arrangements for property held in trust by those partners. Option E is incorrect because the Companies Act 2006 deals with the governance of companies and their directors, not trust property co-owned by individual investors or partners.

## Question 4 A landowner owns a large undeveloped parcel of land in a suburban area, which has been in the family for several decades. Upon deciding to develop the land into a residential subdivision, the landowner discovers that the land is unregistered. The legal advisor explains that to proceed with the development, the landowner must initiate the process of compulsory first registration. What event specifically necessitates compulsory first registration of the land under the Land Registration Act 2002? - A. The landowner plans to divide the land into smaller plots for sale. - B. The land has agricultural classification. - C. The landowner is granting a long lease on part of the land for the first time. - D. The land is undeveloped suburban land. - E. The land has been in the family for several decades without transaction.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is C. Under the Land Registration Act 2002, compulsory first registration is necessitated when granting a lease of over seven years on unregistered land. This condition applies to Edward's scenario as he is developing the land and likely granting long leases on the new residential plots, thus necessitating registration. Option A is incorrect because merely planning to divide the land into smaller plots for sale does not trigger compulsory first registration unless those plots are being sold for the first time since December 1990, which was not specified. Option B is incorrect because the agricultural classification of the land on its own does not necessitate compulsory first registration; it is the act of conveyance for value or the granting of a lease over seven years that triggers this requirement. Option D is incorrect as the developmental status of the land (undeveloped suburban land) is not a determining factor under the Land Registration Act 2002 for compulsory first registration. Rather, it is the selling or the leasing for a term greater than seven years that triggers the requirement. Option E is incorrect because the duration of time the land has been held within a family without transaction is irrelevant to the requirement for compulsory first registration. The trigger is a conveyance for value or substantial leasehold transactions.

## Question 5 After acquiring a commercial property, a borrower decides to take out a mortgage with a finance company to fund further expansion of a business. Included in the fine print of the mortgage agreement, there is a clause that obliges the borrower to procure all insurance policies related to the property exclusively from an insurance broker that is a subsidiary of the lender, for the entire term of the mortgage. Considering the protectiveness of borrowers against unfair mortgage terms, which legal concept is essential in reviewing the validity of the clause the borrower encountered in the mortgage agreement? - A. The principle of good faith in commercial contracts, ensuring fair dealings between the contracting parties. - B. The rule against penalties, scrutinising the fairness of charges imposed for contractual breaches. - C. The doctrine of equitable charges, concerning the creation and enforcement of security interests. - D. The principle against restrictions on the equity of redemption, assessing if terms unduly limit rights. - E. The concept of unconscionable bargains, evaluating if the mortgage agreement exploits the borrower.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is D. The principle against restrictions on the equity of redemption is fundamental in examining whether the clause that binds the borrower to procure insurance policies exclusively from the lender's subsidiary for the term of the mortgage unduly limits the borrower's rights as a mortgagor. This principle protects borrowers from terms that could unfairly restrict their financial freedom or their right to redeem the mortgage on equitable terms. Option A is incorrect because the principle of good faith in commercial contracts, while important, does not specifically address the enforceability of terms that may infringe upon the rights traditionally protected in mortgage arrangements. Option B is incorrect as the rule against penalties is primarily concerned with the fairness of charges for breaches of contract, which is not directly related to the scenario described with the borrower's mortgage agreement. Option C is incorrect because the doctrine of equitable charges pertains to the creation of security interests over properties rather than the specific terms of mortgages that might restrict the borrower's actions. Option E is incorrect because, although the concept of unconscionable bargains addresses exploitative contracts, the principle against restrictions on the equity of redemption more accurately targets the issue of limiting the borrower's rights under the mortgage agreement.

## Question 6 Two neighbouring property owners share a driveway, with one property located at the end, necessitating traversing the other owner's property. Recently, the owner of the front property expressed an intention to install a gate at the entrance of the driveway, requiring a code for access, which has not been shared with the rear property owner. How can the rear property owner ensure continued access to the property? - A. Negotiate with the front property owner to purchase an access code. - B. Request intervention from the local housing association. - C. Apply for a court order to formally recognize the driveway use as an easement. - D. Install a separate gate to secure an alternative access path. - E. Accept the front owner's decision, seeking alternative parking arrangements.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is C. The rear property owner should apply for a court order to formally recognize the driveway use as an easement, ensuring the legal right to access the property without hindrance from the proposed gate. Option A is incorrect because negotiating with the front owner to purchase an access code implies a temporary and possibly revocable permission rather than securing a permanent right of way. Option B is incorrect because while housing associations may enforce certain community rules and standards, they typically do not have the authority to intervene in legal disputes between property owners over access rights. Option D is incorrect because installing a separate gate does not resolve the underlying issue of legally protected access through the front property, and could further complicate matters or violate local planning regulations. Option E is incorrect because accepting the front owner's decision and seeking alternative parking arrangements does not protect the rear owner's legal right of access to the property, potentially diminishing the property's value and utility.

## Question 7 An individual has been living in a property owned by a friend for the past five years, without any formal agreement. Over this period, the individual has invested substantial savings into modernizing the property, believing the friend's verbal promise that occupancy could continue indefinitely. Recently, the property owner passed away and the heirs are planning to sell the property, asking the occupant to leave. On which legal principle could the occupant rely to argue for the right to continue living in the property? - A. An implied common law lease. - B. A formal express trust over the property. - C. A registered charge against the property. - D. Asserting proprietary estoppel concerning the property. - E. Claiming a legal easement to reside in the property.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is D. The occupant should rely on the principle of proprietary estoppel, given the significant investment based on the deceased owner's assurance, which was detrimentally relied on, making it fair to enforce the promise. Option A is incorrect because a common law lease typically requires a formal agreement, specifying terms and duration, which was absent in this case. Option B is incorrect as a formal express trust relates to property ownership intended to be held on behalf of another, requiring a formal declaration, not applicable for merely living arrangements based on verbal promises. Option C is incorrect because a registered charge usually pertains to a financial security interest over a property, such as a mortgage, rather than a right to reside based on an informal arrangement. Option E is incorrect because a legal easement is a right over the property that benefits another piece of land, not a personal right to reside, and usually requires formal creation.

## Question 8 A landowner has discovered gold deposits beneath the surface of agricultural land, which has been owned and used for over 20 years. The land is unregistered, and the landowner has never looked into the mineral rights associated with the property. Interested in mining the gold, the landowner seeks legal advice on rights concerning the gold deposits found on the land. Under the general principles of Land Law in England and Wales, which of the following best describes the landowner's rights to the gold deposits found beneath the land? - A. The landowner has automatic rights to any minerals found on the property, including gold, because of land ownership. - B. The landowner needs to apply for a mining license to extract gold, but does not automatically own the minerals found on the land. - C. Gold and silver typically belong to the Crown, so the landowner would need to obtain permission from the Crown Estate to extract it. - D. The landowner can claim rights to the gold deposits through adverse possession, given long-term use of the land. - E. The landowner's rights to the gold deposits depend on the specific terms of the deed of the property purchase.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is C. Gold and silver found in England and Wales are generally considered to belong to the Crown, under the principle of 'Mines Royal'. Therefore, even if the landowner owns the land, permission from the Crown Estate would be required to legally extract any gold deposits discovered on the property. Option A is incorrect because owning land does not automatically grant the owner rights to all minerals found on the land. Specific minerals like gold and silver are exceptions to this rule. Option B is incorrect because while a mining license might be necessary for extraction activities, simply obtaining a license does not address the ownership rights of the minerals, particularly gold and silver, which are reserved for the Crown. Option D is incorrect because adverse possession relates to the acquisition of rights over land, not the minerals found beneath it. The concept does not apply to the claiming of mineral rights in this context. Option E is incorrect because while the deeds might specify certain rights, the ownership of gold and silver found beneath the land in England and Wales typically falls under the jurisdiction of the Crown, overriding any such terms.

## Question 9 A restaurant owner has recently extended their property to include an outdoor dining area. To provide guest access, they've negotiated a right of way over the adjoining car park owned by a neighboring retailer, formalized in a signed deed. The agreement mentions the right of way but is silent on the responsibility for maintaining the path. Who is responsible for maintaining the path used for the right of way? - A. The restaurant owner must maintain the path at their own expense. - B. The neighboring retailer is entirely responsible for the path's maintenance. - C. Both the restaurant owner and the neighboring retailer share the maintenance costs equally. - D. The restaurant owner can require the retailer to contribute to the maintenance costs. - E. The local council is responsible for maintaining the path as it is used by the public.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is A. Under the principles of English land law concerning easements, the burden of maintaining the infrastructure necessary for the use of an easement, in this case, the path for a right of way, falls on the grantee, unless an agreement or deed specifies otherwise. Since the deed is silent on this matter, the restaurant owner, as the grantee of the right of way, must bear the maintenance costs of the path. Option B is incorrect because there is no inherent obligation for the grantor, the neighboring retailer, to maintain the path unless specifically agreed upon. Option C is incorrect because, by default, maintenance costs do not automatically split between the grantor and grantee without an explicit arrangement or deed provision. Option D is incorrect because, under English land law, the grantee cannot unilaterally require the grantor to share in the maintenance costs without a specific agreement or deed stipulation. Option E is incorrect because the local council's responsibility for maintaining paths usually does not extend to private easements unless the path is dedicated to public use, and this is not indicated in the scenario provided.

## Question 10 During a property transaction, Blake, a property solicitor, is representing Taylor, who is interested in purchasing a large piece of agricultural land that has been in the current owner’s family for generations. The land is unregistered, and Taylor is concerned about potential undisclosed interests that could affect the purchase. Blake is aware that diligent examination of historical deeds and conducting proper searches are imperative to uncover any such interests, particularly those that might fall under the purview of the Land Charges Act 1972. What action should Blake take to best ensure Taylor is made aware of any equitable third-party claims against the property? - A. Consult the Land Registry’s digital archive for any registered charges. - B. Conduct a search of the Local Land Charges register. - C. Perform a detailed review of Class D land charges. - D. Apply for an official search in the Land Charges Department under Class C and D. - E. Rely solely on the doctrine of notice to identify any potential claims.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is D. Blake should apply for an official search in the Land Charges Department under Class C and D to best ensure that Taylor is made aware of any equitable third-party claims against the property. This approach is comprehensive and covers a wide range of interests that could affect Taylor’s purchase, from general and specific equitable charges to restrictive covenants and estate contracts. Option A is incorrect because the Land Registry’s digital archive is primarily for registered land, and this scenario specifies that the land is unregistered, thus making such a search irrelevant in this context. Option B is incorrect as the Local Land Charges register only covers certain types of charges, such as planning permissions and listed building consents, and does not extensively cover equitable third-party claims against unregistered land. Option C is incorrect because focusing solely on Class D land charges may omit important interests categorized under other classes, such as Class C, which are equally important for ensuring Taylor is aware of potential claims against the property. Option E is incorrect as relying solely on the doctrine of notice is insufficient in the context of unregistered land, where certain interests must be registered in the Land Charges Department to be enforceable against a purchaser.

SQE1 FLK2 Land Law Sample Questions July 2024