## Facts

- Joseph Lopez Wilson was admitted to practice law in Nebraska in 1986 and practiced privately in Douglas County.
- Wilson represented Carlos Moreno in immigration matters, including obtaining a professional work visa in 1995, and later represented Moreno in a divorce that ended in a 1997 decree; Wilson was paid for both matters.
- Wilson and Moreno developed a personal friendship beyond the professional relationship.
- After Wilson separated from his wife, Moreno began a relationship with Wilson’s estranged wife.
- In response, Wilson repeatedly contacted Moreno and threatened to report Moreno to immigration authorities based on Moreno’s employment change and threatened to reopen the divorce to report alleged asset misstatements.
- Wilson demanded payment of about $5,000 for prior legal services and tied that demand to his stated willingness to refrain from making the threatened reports.
- Moreno obtained a protective order against Wilson and filed a grievance with disciplinary authorities.
- After a hearing, the Committee on Inquiry found reasonable grounds to believe Wilson violated the Nebraska Code of Professional Responsibility, and formal charges were filed in the Nebraska Supreme Court.
- Wilson admitted the essential factual allegations but denied that his conduct violated ethical rules; the case proceeded on briefing in an original disciplinary proceeding, with de novo review on the record under a clear and convincing evidence standard.

## Issues

1. Whether Wilson’s threats and coercive conduct toward a former client violated his attorney’s oath and Canon 1, DR 1-102(A)(1) and (6).
2. What sanction was appropriate given the misconduct and Nebraska’s disciplinary factors.

## Decision

- The Nebraska Supreme Court found, by clear and convincing evidence, that Wilson violated his oath of office and Canon 1, DR 1-102(A)(1) and (6).
- The Court concluded Wilson’s conduct was hostile and coercive and improperly used his status and knowledge as a lawyer against a former client.
- The Court imposed a suspension from the practice of law.

## Legal Principles

- Attorney discipline proceedings are tried de novo on the record, and charges must be proven by clear and convincing evidence.
- Conduct violating a disciplinary rule, or conduct bringing the legal profession into disrepute, is grounds for discipline, including suspension or disbarment.
- DR 1-102(A)(1) prohibits violating a disciplinary rule; DR 1-102(A)(6) prohibits conduct that adversely reflects on a lawyer’s fitness to practice.
- Threatening or using legal and administrative processes against a (former) client for personal retaliation or to extract payment, particularly where tied to information arising from representation, reflects adversely on fitness to practice.
- In selecting a sanction, the Court considers the nature of the offense, deterrence, the bar’s reputation, public protection, the lawyer’s attitude, and present or future fitness to practice, along with mitigating circumstances.

## Conclusion

The Nebraska Supreme Court suspended Wilson for leveraging threats involving immigration reporting and renewed litigation against a former client to advance personal and financial aims, conduct found to violate the attorney’s oath and DR 1-102(A)(1) and (6) and to warrant significant discipline to protect the public and the integrity of the profession.


State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Neb. Supreme Court v. Lopez Wilson, 262 Neb. 653 (2001)