## Facts

- During the early morning hours of August 13, 2010, Baton Rouge police responded to an apartment complex at North Marque Ann Drive and West La Margie Avenue to a report of a nonresponsive male, later identified as David Mitchell.
- Officers found Mitchell’s body on the side of the apartment complex. Investigators observed spots of blood leading from the area near Mitchell’s vehicle in the parking lot to the location where the body was found.
- Near Mitchell’s vehicle, police found a pair of slippers, a set of keys, and Mitchell’s driver’s license.
- Investigators recovered ballistic evidence, including a spent projectile located inside the broken taillight of a white Pontiac Firebird parked near Mitchell’s vehicle and another spent projectile in front of the apartment complex.
- A forensic scientist testified that at least four shots were fired and that it was “very possible” all were fired from the same firearm.
- The coroner testified that Mitchell had been shot three times and died from multiple gunshot wounds to his torso and extremities; the fatal wound was to the upper back, exiting through the right lateral chest region.
- In September and October 2010, detectives received information from two individuals—Calvin Moore and Darrell Butler—who identified Thaddius Brothers as the shooter.
- In later stages of the investigation, including a cold-case review, law enforcement continued developing leads and revisiting witness information.
- Brothers was indicted by grand jury for second degree murder (La. R.S. 14:30.1), pled not guilty, and proceeded to a jury trial.
- At trial, Moore and Butler testified but recanted, stating their earlier identifications of Brothers were false. Over objection, the State introduced evidence of their prior identifications to law enforcement.
- The jury found Brothers guilty as charged, and the trial court imposed the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.

## Issues

1. Whether the evidence was sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Brothers was the shooter when the State’s proof of identity relied heavily on prior out-of-court identifications that were disavowed at trial.
2. Whether the jury could treat Moore’s and Butler’s prior identifications as substantive evidence (not merely impeachment) when the declarants testified at trial and were subject to cross-examination.

## Decision

- The Louisiana First Circuit affirmed Brothers’s conviction and life sentence.
- The court held that, on sufficiency review, credibility choices and conflicts between trial testimony and prior statements are for the jury to resolve.
- The court concluded the jury was permitted to credit the witnesses’ earlier identifications and reject their trial recantations.
- Viewing the totality of the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the court found a rational juror could have found Brothers guilty of second degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt.

## Legal Principles

- Under Jackson v. Virginia, the reviewing court asks whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could find the essential elements of the offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
- An appellate court does not reweigh evidence or second-guess the factfinder’s credibility determinations; it does not act as a “thirteenth juror.”
- Prior identifications by a witness may be admitted and considered as substantive evidence when the identifying witness testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination, even if the witness later recants.
- When testimony conflicts (including recantations), the factfinder may accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony of any witness; those determinations generally control on appeal if the Jackson standard is met.
- Identity may be proven through direct and circumstantial evidence taken together; the State is not required to negate every hypothesis of innocence, but must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

## Conclusion

State v. Thaddius Brothers affirmed a second degree murder conviction where two key witnesses identified Brothers during the investigation but testified at trial that their identifications were false. The First Circuit held that sufficiency review under Jackson required deference to the jury’s resolution of credibility disputes and that the jury could rely on the prior identifications as substantive evidence because the witnesses testified and were cross-examined. Considering the physical evidence and the identification evidence in the light most favorable to the State, the court concluded a rational juror could find Brothers was the shooter and therefore affirmed the conviction and mandatory life sentence.


State v. Thaddius Brothers, 233 So. 3d 110 (2017)