Welcome

Stephenson v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 882

ResourcesStephenson v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 882

Facts

  • Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd acted as trustee for a trust containing shares in a company.
  • The beneficiaries were absolutely entitled to the trust assets, being of full age and capacity.
  • The beneficiaries sought to terminate the trust under the rule in Saunders v Vautier, requesting transfer of the trust shares to themselves.
  • The Inspector of Taxes argued that this transfer constituted a disposal for capital gains tax (CGT) purposes, triggering a chargeable gain under the Finance Act 1965.
  • The beneficiaries contended that they were already absolutely entitled, so no disposal had occurred.

Issues

  1. Whether the act of beneficiaries terminating a trust under the rule in Saunders v Vautier and taking transfer of trust assets constitutes a disposal for CGT purposes under the Finance Act 1965.
  2. Whether such a transfer results in a chargeable gain and associated tax liability for the beneficiaries.

Decision

  • The court held that the termination of the trust by the beneficiaries did not constitute a disposal for CGT purposes.
  • It was reasoned that the transfer of the trust assets was merely a formal recognition of the beneficiaries' existing equitable rights, not a transfer of ownership.
  • No chargeable gain arose from the termination of the trust in these circumstances.
  • The rule in Saunders v Vautier allows beneficiaries who are absolutely entitled and of full age and capacity to require trustees to terminate the trust and transfer the assets.
  • For CGT purposes, no disposal occurs on trust termination where beneficiaries are already absolutely entitled to the assets.
  • Tax legislation should be interpreted consistently with fundamental trust law principles to prevent undue tax liabilities when beneficiaries exercise their rights.
  • The mere formalization of beneficiaries’ equitable holdings does not amount to a "disposal" for capital gains tax.

Conclusion

The court clarified that terminating a trust under the rule in Saunders v Vautier does not trigger a disposal for capital gains tax where beneficiaries are absolutely entitled, ensuring certainty for trustees and beneficiaries regarding the tax treatment of such trust terminations.

Assistant

Responses can be incorrect. Please double check.