Stevenson Jacques & Co v McLean (1880) 5 QBD 346

Facts

  • The case involved the sale of iron, with McLean offering to sell to Stevenson Jacques & Co at a specified price, the offer stated to remain open until a particular date.
  • Before the deadline, Stevenson Jacques & Co sent a telegram inquiring about the possibility of buying the iron at a slightly lower price.
  • McLean treated this inquiry as a rejection of the original offer and proceeded to sell the iron to a third party.
  • Subsequently, Stevenson Jacques & Co telegraphed their acceptance of the original offer.
  • The central dispute was whether the initial telegram was a counter-offer (terminating the original offer) or merely a request for information (leaving the original offer open).

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs’ inquiry about a different price constituted a counter-offer or a mere request for information.
  2. Whether the original offer remained open and capable of acceptance after the plaintiffs' telegram.
  3. How the distinction between counter-offer and request for information affects the formation of a binding contract.

Decision

  • The court held that the plaintiffs' telegram was a request for information, not a counter-offer.
  • It was found that the original offer had not been terminated and remained open for acceptance.
  • Acceptance of the original offer by the plaintiffs was valid, resulting in a binding contract.

Legal Principles

  • A counter-offer introduces new terms or modifies existing ones, thereby rejecting and terminating the original offer.
  • A request for information seeks clarification without altering the offer, and does not terminate the original offer.
  • The assessment is made objectively, considering how a reasonable person would interpret the communication between the parties.
  • Clear and unequivocal acceptance is required to form a legally binding contract.
  • Communications during negotiations must be carefully distinguished to avoid inadvertently terminating offers.

Conclusion

Stevenson Jacques & Co v McLean (1880) 5 QBD 346 established that a mere inquiry regarding terms does not amount to a counter-offer or rejection, ensuring the original offer may still be accepted and forming the basis for contractual certainty in negotiations.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal