## Facts

- Insureds Robert R. Stofer and Joseph N. Fox held Illinois fire insurance policies issued by their insurers and written on the state-mandated standard form.
- Illinois Insurance Code §§ 397 and 401 authorized the Director of Insurance to issue rules to achieve uniformity in basic fire policies and to make reasonable rules necessary to make the insurance laws effective.
- Using that authority, the Director promulgated a rule prescribing a standard fire and lightning policy and prohibiting nonconforming policy forms.
- The standard policy included a provision requiring any action to recover for a loss to be filed within 12 months after the loss.
- Stofer and Fox filed suit against their insurers more than 12 months after their respective losses.
- The insurers asserted the 12-month contractual limitation as a defense.
- The circuit court held §§ 397 and 401 unconstitutional as an improper delegation of legislative power under the Illinois Constitution’s separation-of-powers clause and allowed direct interlocutory review.
- The circuit court did not decide whether the insurers’ conduct waived the 12-month limitation; that issue remained unresolved.

## Issues

1. Whether Insurance Code §§ 397 and 401 unconstitutionally delegate legislative power by authorizing the Director of Insurance to prescribe a uniform fire policy that includes a 12-month limitation period for suit.
2. Whether the statutory direction to achieve uniformity and concurrency of fire insurance contracts supplies sufficient standards to guide the Director’s rulemaking.

## Decision

- The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the circuit court’s constitutional ruling and remanded.
- The court held §§ 397 and 401 are constitutional and permit the Director to prescribe a standard fire policy form, including a 12-month suit-limitation clause.
- The court limited its decision to the delegation/separation-of-powers question and expressed no view on waiver of the limitation clause.

## Legal Principles

- The legislature may delegate authority to an administrative officer to implement a statutory scheme by rulemaking when the statute states the governing policy and provides standards that confine discretion.
- A directive to achieve uniformity in basic fire policies and concurrency of contract among insurers covering the same risk is a sufficient legislative standard for administrative specification of policy-form details.
- Administrative standardization of contract terms in a regulated industry, when tied to stated legislative purposes and limited to reasonable rules necessary to effectuate the law, does not violate separation of powers.
- A contractual limitation period in a mandated insurance policy form may be treated as an implementational detail within the regulatory scheme and does not alter generally applicable statutory limitation periods.

## Conclusion

The Illinois Supreme Court upheld statutory provisions empowering the Director of Insurance to mandate a uniform fire insurance policy form, including a 12-month limitation for bringing suit, concluding the delegation was guided by adequate legislative standards and did not violate separation of powers; the case was remanded for further proceedings on issues not reached below.


Stofer v. Motor Vehicle Casualty Co., 68 Ill. 2d 361, 369 N.E.2d 875 (Ill. 1977)