## Facts

- William Sykes died from injuries sustained when a chemical distillation unit exploded at the power/chemical plant where he worked.
- Barbara Sykes, acting as administratrix for William’s estate and also individually, filed suit against Propane Power Corporation and multiple other defendants connected to the plant and its operations.
- Barbara and William were not legally married, but they lived together for about 22 years, had four children, and held themselves out to others as husband and wife.
- Among the defendants were Sullivan Engineering Group, Inc. and Leroy E. Sullivan III, an engineer retained to assist the plant with environmental regulatory compliance and permitting, including preparing drawings/layouts used for submissions to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
- The Law Division entered summary judgment for Sullivan Engineering and Sullivan, concluding their limited environmental work was not a legal cause of the explosion-related death.
- The Law Division also dismissed/struck Barbara Sykes’s individual claims for loss of consortium and for wrongful-death damages as a “surviving spouse,” reasoning that New Jersey law limits those remedies to persons in a legal marriage and, for wrongful death, to statutory beneficiaries tied to intestate succession.
- Barbara appealed, challenging both (1) the summary judgment in favor of the engineer defendants and (2) the dismissal of her individual consortium and wrongful-death-benefit claims, including on equal-protection grounds.

## Issues

1. Whether an engineer and engineering firm retained for environmental permitting and related drawings owed a duty of care broad enough to impose tort liability for a later plant explosion that killed an employee.
2. Whether a long-term unmarried cohabitant may recover loss-of-consortium damages under New Jersey law.
3. Whether an unmarried cohabitant may recover as a beneficiary under New Jersey’s Wrongful Death Act when the statute ties beneficiaries to those entitled to inherit by intestate succession, and whether excluding such a partner violates equal protection.

## Decision

- The Appellate Division affirmed summary judgment for Sullivan Engineering Group, Inc. and Leroy E. Sullivan III, holding that, given the limited scope of their engagement (environmental compliance/permitting), they did not owe a duty to foresee or prevent the specific operational/safety risks that produced the explosion.
- The Appellate Division affirmed dismissal of Barbara Sykes’s individual loss-of-consortium claim because New Jersey limits consortium claims to spouses in a legally recognized marriage.
- The Appellate Division affirmed dismissal of Barbara Sykes’s individual wrongful-death-benefits claim because the Wrongful Death Act limits recovery to persons entitled to inherit from the decedent under intestacy, which does not include an unmarried partner; the court declined to expand the statutory class based on the couple’s long-term relationship or equal-protection arguments.
- Disposition: affirmed.

## Legal Principles

- Duty in negligence turns on foreseeability and fairness, and the scope of any duty should correspond to the scope of the defendant’s undertaking and responsibility.
- A professional who undertakes to provide services must exercise the skill and knowledge ordinarily possessed by members of that profession, but liability is not imposed for risks outside the task the professional was retained to perform.
- Affixing a professional seal to generalized drawings prepared for regulatory purposes does not, by itself, create a broad duty to identify and correct unrelated workplace safety hazards or operating procedures.
- In New Jersey, loss-of-consortium damages are available only when founded on a valid marriage relationship.
- New Jersey’s Wrongful Death Act limits beneficiaries to those entitled to take the decedent’s property by intestate succession; courts generally leave any expansion of that beneficiary class to the Legislature rather than redefining “spouse” to include unmarried cohabitants.

## Conclusion

*Sykes v. Propane Power Corp.* held that an environmental-permitting engineer and his firm were not liable for a fatal plant explosion where their retained role did not include plant-safety review or operational decision-making, and it also held that a long-term unmarried partner could not recover loss-of-consortium damages or wrongful-death benefits because New Jersey law ties those remedies to legal marriage and intestate-succession eligibility.


Sykes v. Propane Power Corp., 541 A.2d 271 (1988)