Facts
- The settlor, facing terminal illness, established a charitable trust by executing a trust deed.
- He appointed himself as one of the trustees of the charitable trust.
- The settlor expressed an intent to transfer certain assets to that trust, but failed to complete all necessary legal documentation before his death.
- As a result, the completed transfer of legal title to the assets did not occur in favour of all the trustees before the settlor’s death.
- The dispute arose over whether this incomplete transfer was effective to vest the property in the trustees, or whether it left the property in the settlor's estate.
Issues
- Whether a trust is validly constituted where the settlor, as one of the trustees, failed to formally transfer property into the name of all trustees.
- Whether equity will perfect an imperfect gift in circumstances where the settlor is also a trustee.
- Whether the conscience of a donor acting as a trustee is sufficiently affected to preclude them from resiling from the intended transfer.
Decision
- The House of Lords held that the assets in question were effectively vested in the trustees of the charity.
- The court ruled that a valid trust existed even though the legal title to the property had not been formally transferred to all trustees.
- The settlor's position as both donor and trustee was sufficient to constitute an effective transfer in equity.
- The trustees were under a legal obligation to transfer the property into the name of all trustees.
- This constituted an exception to the general rule that equity will not perfect an imperfect gift.
Legal Principles
- Equity generally does not perfect an imperfect gift where legal requirements for transfer are incomplete.
- An exception exists when the donor is also one of the trustees; upon declaration, the donor’s conscience is considered affected and they are bound by the trust.
- A trustee is legally obliged to give effect to the trust, including ensuring the transfer of property into the joint names of all trustees.
- The exception is limited to scenarios where the donor and trustee roles overlap, and does not apply when the donor is not also a trustee.
Conclusion
The decision in T Choithram International SA v Pagarani established a principled exception to the rule against perfecting imperfect gifts, holding that a settlor who is also a trustee can create a valid trust even if the formal transfer process is incomplete, provided their conscience is affected by the trust declaration.