## Facts

- Amanda Thompson, as special administratrix of the estate of Thomas William “Tommy” Thompson, brought a wrongful-death action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).
- Benjamin Kitteaux was a Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) trainee employed by the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe as a police officer and worked from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) police station.
- As part of his police training, Kitteaux was issued a firearm and received extensive instruction on quick draw techniques.
- On July 12, 1975, while on duty at the BIA police station, Kitteaux simulated a quick draw with his firearm; the weapon discharged and shot Tommy Thompson in the chest.
- Thompson died from the gunshot wound.
- On August 25, 1975, Kitteaux pleaded guilty in federal court and was convicted of involuntary manslaughter under 18 U.S.C. § 1112.
- Thompson’s estate filed an administrative claim for damages with the Department of the Interior; the claim was denied.
- The estate then filed suit under the FTCA, and the case was tried to the court.
- The United States argued that Kitteaux’s conduct was strictly forbidden and therefore outside the scope of any covered employment relationship, defeating FTCA liability.

## Issues

1. Whether Kitteaux qualified as an “employee of the Government” under the FTCA’s definition in 28 U.S.C. § 2671.
2. Whether Kitteaux’s negligent handling of the firearm during a mock quick draw, though allegedly forbidden, occurred within the scope of his employment under South Dakota law.
3. If the United States was liable under the FTCA, what pecuniary wrongful-death damages were recoverable.

## Decision

- The court held that Kitteaux was an “employee of the Government” within the meaning of the FTCA.
- The court held that the shooting occurred within the scope of Kitteaux’s employment under South Dakota respondeat superior rules.
- The court found the death resulted from Kitteaux’s negligent act.
- The court entered judgment for the estate and awarded $35,000 in pecuniary damages.

## Legal Principles

- The FTCA permits recovery against the United States for negligent or wrongful acts of a government employee acting within the scope of employment, as determined by the law of the place where the act occurred.
- For FTCA purposes, “employee of the Government” includes persons acting on behalf of a federal agency in an official capacity; the analysis looks to the real working relationship and federal direction, not only to payroll labels.
- Under South Dakota respondeat superior principles, an employer may be liable for torts committed on duty and at the workplace when the conduct is sufficiently connected to assigned work, even if the act was unauthorized or forbidden.
- Mishandling a service firearm entrusted for law-enforcement duties can fall within the scope of employment when it occurs during working hours, at the station, and involves job-related equipment.
- Wrongful-death recovery under the FTCA is limited to the pecuniary loss allowed by applicable state law, and the court may award damages supported by the trial record.

## Conclusion

In Thompson v. United States, the district court held the United States liable under the FTCA for the wrongful death of Tommy Thompson after Benjamin Kitteaux, a CETA trainee serving as a tribal police officer working from a BIA police station, negligently discharged his service firearm during a mock quick draw while on duty. The court concluded Kitteaux qualified as a covered government employee and that his conduct—though allegedly forbidden—was within the scope of employment under South Dakota law, resulting in an award of $35,000 in pecuniary damages to the estate.


Thompson v. United States, 504 F. Supp. 1087 (1980)