## Facts

- A minor was seriously injured when a can of denatured alcohol exploded and splashed burning liquid on him.
- The minor and his parents sued a retailer, alleging knowing violations of federal consumer product safety rules, plus state-law theories of negligence, implied warranty, and strict products liability.
- The retailer filed a third-party complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14 against an adult (Keller), alleging his negligent use contributed to the accident and seeking contribution under Pennsylvania law.
- The plaintiffs moved to dismiss the third-party complaint, arguing the contribution claim was unrelated to the federal statutory and products-liability theories.
- Keller moved to dismiss or sever the parents from their plaintiff alignment and join them in a defensive posture so he could seek contribution based on their alleged negligence.

## Issues

1. Whether Rule 14 permits a defendant in a products-liability and federal statutory action to implead an alleged joint tortfeasor for contribution arising from the same accident.
2. Whether the court may sever the parents from their status as plaintiffs and realign/join them defensively so a third-party defendant can assert contribution claims based on their alleged negligence.

## Decision

- The court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the retailer’s third-party complaint against Keller.
- The court held the retailer properly impleaded Keller under Rule 14 because Keller was alleged to be a joint tortfeasor potentially liable in contribution for the same injury.
- The court granted Keller’s motion to sever the parents from their plaintiff posture and join them defensively to permit litigation of contribution claims against them.

## Legal Principles

- Rule 14 impleader is proper when the third party “is or may be liable” to the defending party for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim, including liability for contribution as an alleged joint tortfeasor arising from the same occurrence.
- The existence and scope of a contribution right is a matter of state substantive law; where state law authorizes contribution among joint tortfeasors, impleader may be used in federal court to assert that right.
- A court may order severance and party realignment/joinder as a procedural measure to allow contribution claims to be adjudicated in one action when the alleged negligence arises from the same accident and injury.
- When a federal statutory claim supplies original jurisdiction, related state-law claims and related contribution claims stemming from the same nucleus of operative facts may be heard together.

## Conclusion

The court allowed impleader of an alleged joint tortfeasor for contribution under Rule 14 and permitted severance and defensive joinder of the injured child’s parents so all related contribution issues tied to the same accident could be resolved in the same proceeding.


Tiesler v. Martin Paint Stores, Inc., 76 F.R.D. 640 (E.D. Pa. 1977)