## Facts

- Theresa M. Turner owned a 100′ x 100′ corner lot in Red River Parish, Louisiana. A small, rundown house sat on the lot, but it was not habitable and was not occupied.
- Southern Excavation, Inc. (Southern), a contractor working on a nearby highway project, wanted to use Turner’s lot as a storage and parking area for its equipment during the job.
- Through an agent, Southern contacted Turner by telephone and offered a small payment in exchange for leveling and clearing her land so Southern could use it. Turner refused.
- After Turner declined, Southern entered the property without permission, used heavy equipment to level the lot, and cleared it of vegetation (including trees and shrubs). Turner also alleged that a concrete slab and other materials were disturbed or removed during the work.
- Turner and her family objected and demanded that Southern stop using the property and remove its equipment. Southern continued to use the lot for its operations for an extended period.
- An agent later met Turner and offered to lease the property for a larger amount (reported as $300). Turner again refused and demanded that Southern leave.
- Turner retained counsel, filed suit for trespass, and sought damages for both the physical harm to the property and for her mental anguish and humiliation caused by Southern’s continued presence after repeated refusals.
- Turner obtained a preliminary injunction (in 1974) to stop further trespass.
- After trial, the court found Southern’s trespass was willful and wanton and in bad faith and awarded Turner $1,500 for property damage and $3,500 for mental anguish/humiliation, plus $75 for the cost of a survey and expert witness fees of $50 for each of Turner’s two experts.
- Both sides appealed: Turner sought higher awards (including higher expert fees), while Southern sought reductions and argued that mental-anguish damages and the survey cost should not have been awarded.

## Issues

1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in fixing property damages at $1,500 for a willful, bad-faith trespass that leveled the land and destroyed vegetation with aesthetic and personal value.
2. Whether the trial court erred in awarding $3,500 for Turner’s mental anguish and humiliation caused by Southern’s deliberate, continuing trespass after Turner refused permission.
3. Whether the $75 survey expense was properly assessed against Southern as an item tied to proving or addressing the trespass.
4. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding expert witness fees of $50 for each of Turner’s two experts and refusing to increase those fees.

## Decision

- The court of appeal affirmed the judgment in full.
- The court held the $1,500 property-damage award and the $3,500 mental-anguish award were within the trial court’s discretion given the willful and continuing nature of the trespass and the type of loss involved.
- The court affirmed the $75 survey charge as properly assessed.
- The court affirmed the expert witness fees of $50 per expert as within the trial court’s discretion.

## Legal Principles

- A willful, wanton trespass committed in bad faith can support compensatory damages that are not limited to rigid measures such as restoration cost or reduction in market value when those measures do not fairly reflect the owner’s loss.
- Destruction of trees, shrubs, and similar features may warrant damages that account for aesthetic and personal value, not only market-based valuation.
- Mental anguish, humiliation, and aggravation caused by a deliberate and continuing invasion of property rights may be compensable in trespass cases as part of making the plaintiff whole, rather than as punishment.
- Under Louisiana law governing damages in tort (including former Civil Code art. 1934), trial courts have broad discretion in setting general damages, and appellate courts intervene only for clear abuse of that discretion.
- Reasonable survey expenses connected to identifying, documenting, or proving the trespass may be assessed against the party at fault.
- The amount of expert witness fees is largely committed to the trial court’s discretion, subject to review for abuse.

## Conclusion

In Turner v. Southern Excavation, Inc., the Louisiana court of appeal affirmed a trial court judgment finding a willful, bad-faith trespass where a highway contractor entered and leveled a landowner’s lot after she refused permission. The court upheld awards for property damage and for the owner’s mental anguish and humiliation, as well as a modest survey charge and expert witness fees, concluding the trial court acted within its broad discretion in setting compensatory damages and related costs.


Turner v. Southern Excavation, Inc., 322 So. 2d 326 (1975)