## Introduction

Conditional bail is common where someone faces an imprisonable offence. Courts (and, at earlier stages, the police) may add conditions only where they consider it necessary to manage specific risks that would exist if bail were unconditional. Typical risks are failing to attend court, committing further offences, interfering with witnesses, or otherwise obstructing justice.

In practice, conditions can be numerous and demanding. Since the Covid-19 backlog, the Article 6 ECHR right for proceedings to conclude within a reasonable time has been under pressure, and it is now routine for people to remain on bail for a year or more. That raises a fair question: how far can conditions go, and do they count towards sentence if there is a conviction?

This guide explains when conditions are justified, what they tend to look like, how proportionality is assessed, and the limited circumstances in which time on bail can reduce a custodial sentence.

## What You'll Learn

- When a court may impose bail conditions and the risks they are designed to address
- The most common bail conditions and how they affect day-to-day life
- How necessity, reasonableness and proportionality apply to bail
- Why there is no automatic sentence credit for most bail conditions
- The exception: qualifying curfews with electronic monitoring under s.240A CJA 2003
- How curfew credit is calculated and when it does not apply
- Practical steps to request a variation and to stay compliant

## Core Concepts

### When can bail conditions be imposed?

Courts may impose conditions only where they are necessary to deal with real risks linked to the case. The Bail Act 1976 allows conditions to be attached to bail to:

- Reduce the risk of absconding (failing to surrender to custody)
- Reduce the risk of further offending on bail
- Prevent interference with witnesses or obstruction of justice
- Protect victims or the public from harm

Pre-trial conditional bail is, in many cases, an alternative to remand in custody. There is no fixed limit on the number of conditions that can be imposed. Even so, each condition must be individually justified and the overall package must not exceed what is needed to manage the identified risks.

Longer case timelines since the pandemic have increased the period many people spend on bail. Article 6 ECHR requires proceedings to be completed within a reasonable time, but lengthy bail alone does not relax the necessity test for conditions: they must still be necessary and proportionate to the risks.

### Common bail conditions (with examples)

Conditions should be tailored to the alleged conduct and the risks in the case. Examples include:

- Non-contact: not to contact the complainant or prosecution witnesses, directly or indirectly (including social media and third parties)
- Exclusion: not to attend a named address or area; sometimes an entire town or county
- Reporting: to sign at a named police station on specified days and times
- Residence: to live and sleep each night at a specified address
- Curfew: to remain at a specified address between fixed hours, sometimes with electronic monitoring (“tag”)

How this plays out:

- Offence against the person or domestic allegation: a non-contact condition with the complainant and an exclusion zone around their home or workplace helps prevent intimidation and reduces the risk of further incidents.
- Theft where the alleged conduct targets particular premises: a non-attendance condition at the store(s) or a broader town-centre exclusion can be used to reduce further offending.
- Public order or gang-related allegation: an exclusion zone and non-association conditions with named individuals may be imposed to reduce the risk of disorder.

These conditions are often considered necessary and proportionate, but they can still be very demanding. Reporting in the middle of the working day can disrupt employment; residence and exclusion requirements can strain family life and caring duties. In more serious cases, a combination of several conditions is not unusual.

### Proportionality and the number of conditions

- Necessity: The court must be satisfied that conditions are needed to address specific risks that unconditional bail would not manage.
- Reasonableness: The condition must be practical and clear. For example, signing at a police station should be possible within stated times, and addresses or zones must be clearly defined.
- Proportionality: The condition should go no further than required to address the risks. If reporting twice weekly is enough, daily reporting should not be required.

There is no cap on the number of conditions, but piling on conditions without a clear link to the risk is improper. The overall effect matters: courts should consider how conditions interact, especially where reporting times collide with work, residence rules affect childcare, or exclusion zones make medical or legal appointments difficult. If a package is heavier than needed, a court should pare it back.

It is also important to note that most pre-trial bail conditions do not count towards sentence if there is a conviction. They are preventative, not punitive.

### Qualifying curfews and sentence credit (s.240A CJA 2003)

There is one significant exception. Section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 allows time spent on a qualifying curfew with electronic monitoring to be credited against an immediate custodial sentence.

Key points:

- What is a qualifying curfew? A curfew for at least 9 hours per day, enforced by electronic monitoring (a “tag”), usually overnight.
- How is credit calculated? Typically, half a day is deducted for each day spent on a qualifying curfew. For example, 50 days on a qualifying curfew usually translates into 25 days’ credit towards the custodial term.
- When does it apply? Only when the court imposes an immediate custodial sentence. It does not reduce suspended sentences or community orders.
- Proof: The court will usually rely on electronic monitoring records to confirm curfew compliance and dates.

Why only curfews? Curfew with electronic monitoring is objectively defined (set hours and recorded compliance). Other conditions vary widely in their effect from one person to another, making any sentence credit exercise highly subjective and resource-heavy. Sentencing guidelines also aim for consistent treatment across similar cases, which is easier to maintain with a narrow, objective rule.

## Key Examples or Case Studies

- Alleged assault with a named complainant
  - Conditions: non-contact with the complainant, exclusion zone around their home and workplace, and twice-weekly reporting.
  - Point to note: The conditions target the risks of intimidation and further offending. If reporting times clash with work, the court may adjust the schedule while preserving the protective effect.

- Alleged shop thefts from a national chain
  - Conditions: not to enter the chain’s stores nationwide, not to enter the town centre where the offences are alleged, and residence at a verified address.
  - Point to note: Wide exclusions can be proportionate where there is a pattern of similar alleged conduct, but they should not make lawful daily life impossible. If the exclusion is too broad (e.g., no access to a GP or job centre), a tailored map or time-limited exception can be sought.

- Ten-week electronically monitored curfew
  - Facts: 70 days on a 10-hour nightly tag while on bail.
  - Outcome on sentence: If an immediate custodial sentence is imposed, the court should consider 35 days’ credit. No credit is available if the sentence is suspended or a community order is made.

## Practical Applications

- Read the bail notice carefully
  - Get clarity on addresses, boundaries, and reporting windows. Ask your solicitor to confirm anything unclear in writing.
  - Store the bail sheet on your phone and keep a printed copy.

- Build compliance into your routine
  - Set calendar alerts for reporting times and curfew hours.
  - Plan travel so you reach the police station and home address in good time.
  - Keep proof (e.g., shifts, tickets) in case there is a dispute about an unavoidable delay.

- Seek a variation if conditions are heavier than needed
  - Grounds: change of circumstances (e.g., new job, caring duties), impractical reporting times, or an exclusion that blocks essential appointments.
  - Process: your solicitor can apply to the Magistrates’ Court (or the Crown Court if that is where your case is) to vary conditions. Propose a workable alternative that still addresses the risk, such as fewer sign-ins or a redrawn exclusion zone with a map.
  - Temporary variations: for one-off events (e.g., a medical appointment within an exclusion zone), your solicitor may obtain agreement from the prosecutor or apply to the court.

- Curfew and sentence credit
  - Check: does the curfew run for at least 9 hours a day and is it electronically monitored?
  - Keep records: tag providers maintain logs, but keep your own note of start and end dates.
  - At sentence: ensure the court is invited to apply s.240A CJA 2003 and announce any credit.

- Breach risks
  - Missing a sign-in or breaking curfew can lead to arrest and a remand application. If something goes wrong, contact your solicitor immediately and keep evidence of the reason (e.g., hospital letter, breakdown report).

- Article 6 delays
  - If the case is dragging, your solicitor can press for active case management, raise the reasonable time point, and seek earlier listing. Extended time on bail alone does not create sentence credit, save for qualifying curfews.

## Summary Checklist

- Conditions can be imposed only where necessary to manage specific risks
- Common conditions: non-contact, exclusion zones, reporting, residence, curfew with or without electronic monitoring
- Packages must be reasonable and proportionate; the number of conditions is not capped
- Most bail conditions do not reduce any later sentence
- Exception: qualifying curfew (9+ hours per day with tag) may give credit under s.240A CJA 2003
- Curfew credit usually equals half a day off for each qualifying day; it applies only to immediate custody
- If conditions are too heavy or impractical, apply to vary with a workable alternative
- Keep clear records of curfew dates, reporting, and any issues

## Quick Reference

| Concept                          | Authority            | Key takeaway                                             |
| -------------------------------- | -------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| Power to impose conditions       | Bail Act 1976 s.3    | Conditions only where necessary to address defined risks |
| Core risks considered            | Bail Act 1976 s.3(6) | Absconding, further offending, interference/obstruction  |
| Reasonable time to trial         | Article 6 ECHR       | Delays do not create sentence credit by themselves       |
| Curfew sentence credit           | CJA 2003 s.240A      | Half-day credit per qualifying day; custody only         |
| What makes a curfew “qualifying” | CJA 2003 s.240A      | At least 9 hours daily and electronically monitored      |

Bail Conditions in England and Wales: Proportionality, Examples, and Curfew Credit