## Introduction

Caveat emptor, Latin for “let the buyer beware”, places the primary risk of defects on the buyer in a contract of sale unless the seller has made a statement or promise that shifts that risk. In its classic form, the buyer is expected to check what is being bought and make sure it is suitable. The seller is not obliged to volunteer every detail about faults.

That said, the rule is not absolute. If the seller misrepresents the goods, conceals a defect, or gives a warranty, the buyer may have remedies. Modern statutes also imply terms as to quality and fitness, especially in consumer contracts. This guide explains the rule, its limits, leading cases (including Smith v Hughes), and practical steps for buyers and sellers.

## What You’ll Learn

- What caveat emptor means and when it applies
- The limits: misrepresentation, concealment, terms, and latent defects
- How implied terms under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and Consumer Rights Act 2015 affect outcomes
- The role of sale by description and sale by sample
- How courts treat mistakes about quality (including Smith v Hughes)
- Practical steps for buyers and sellers to allocate and manage risk
- How the rule plays out in property, used goods, and online sales
- Key statutes and cases at a glance

## Core Concepts

### What the Rule Means and Where It Applies

- Default position: In a sale without promises about quality or fitness, the buyer takes the risk of defects that a sensible inspection could reveal. The seller is generally not required to volunteer problems.
- Scope: The rule developed in sales of goods and land. It still matters in second‑hand markets and property, and it informs negotiations in business‑to‑business deals.
- Objective agreement: Contract formation turns on what was agreed, not on one party’s private assumptions. If the seller does not promise that the goods are of a particular kind or quality, the buyer’s mistaken belief about them is usually not a ground to avoid the contract.
- “With all faults” and “as is”: These phrases are consistent with caveat emptor. In business contracts they may be effective, subject to reasonableness controls. In consumer contracts, they cannot remove statutory rights.

### Limits: Misrepresentation and Concealment

- No protection for dishonesty: If the seller makes a false statement of fact that induces the contract, the buyer may rescind and claim damages (Misrepresentation Act 1967). This applies to fraudulent, negligent, and in some cases innocent misrepresentation.
- Half‑truths and continuing representations: Saying something that is only part of the story, or failing to correct a statement that has become false before completion, can be misrepresentation.
- Active concealment: Taking steps to hide a defect (for example, covering up dry rot) can amount to fraud. Caveat emptor does not protect a seller who conceals.
- Duty to disclose: There is usually no general duty to volunteer information in arm’s‑length sales. Exceptions arise in special relationships (e.g., contracts uberrimae fidei, such as insurance), where disclosure obligations are imposed by law.

### Statutory Implied Terms and Consumer Law

- Sale of Goods Act 1979 (B2B and private sales):
  - Section 13: Goods must match their description.
  - Section 14: In business sales, goods must be of satisfactory quality and fit for any buyer‑made known purpose. This does not generally apply to purely private sales.
  - Section 15: Sale by sample requires the bulk to correspond with the sample, and defects in the sample must not make the bulk unsatisfactory.
  - Exclusion: In B2B contracts, parties may restrict or exclude these terms, but only if reasonable under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.
- Consumer Rights Act 2015 (B2C):
  - Section 9: Goods must be of satisfactory quality.
  - Section 10: Goods must be fit for a particular purpose made known.
  - Section 11: Goods must match their description; also provisions for matching sample/model.
  - Remedies: Short‑term right to reject (usually 30 days), repair/replacement, price reduction, or final right to reject. These rights cannot be excluded.
  - Services and digital content are also covered by the Act with their own standards and remedies.
- Consumer protection rules: The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 prohibit misleading actions and omissions by traders dealing with consumers. The Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 impose pre‑contract information duties and cancellation rights for distance/off‑premises contracts.

### Patent and Latent Defects; Description and Sample; Mistake

- Patent defects: Obvious problems (or those discoverable by a sensible inspection) generally fall on the buyer if no term or misrepresentation applies.
- Latent defects: Hidden problems not discoverable by reasonable inspection are more contested. The seller usually has no duty to volunteer them in B2B or private sales, but liability can arise where there is misrepresentation, an implied term, or concealment. In consumer sales, statutory quality standards apply regardless of visibility.
- Sale by description: If goods are sold by description, they must match that description. A label, advert, or catalogue entry can be a description.
- Sale by sample: If sold by sample, the buyer is entitled to assume the bulk will match the sample in quality and free from hidden defects in the sample that make the bulk unsatisfactory.
- Mistake about quality: A buyer’s error about quality or suitability (without an express or implied term) will not usually void the contract. The key question is whether the quality was part of the agreed terms or description.

## Key Examples or Case Studies

### Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597

- Facts: Buyer thought he was buying old oats suitable for racehorses. Seller supplied new oats. There was no promise about age; a sample was provided.
- Decision: The contract stood. The buyer’s private assumption did not become a term. Having had the chance to inspect the sample, the buyer bore the risk.
- Key point: Caveat emptor applies where no term or misrepresentation addresses the quality in question.

### Ward v Hobbs (1878) 4 App Cas 13

- Facts: Pigs sold at auction “with all faults”. The animals had disease; the seller did not disclose it.
- Decision: No liability absent fraud or warranty. The “with all faults” wording aligned with caveat emptor.
- Key point: Clear risk‑allocation wording is effective in non‑consumer sales unless there is fraud or an unlawful exclusion.

### Keates v Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591

- Facts: Landlord let a house unfit for habitation and did not disclose this.
- Decision: No general duty to disclose defects in the absence of a term or misrepresentation.
- Key point: Silence is not usually actionable; liability turns on statements and terms.

### Gordon v Selico (1986) 278 EG 53

- Facts: Seller’s agents concealed dry rot by painting over it in a property sale.
- Decision: Active concealment amounted to fraudulent misrepresentation.
- Key point: Deliberate concealment removes any shelter under caveat emptor.

### Beale v Taylor [1967] 1 WLR 1193

- Facts: Car described as a particular model; in fact it was a composite of two cars.
- Decision: Sale by description failed; the buyer succeeded.
- Key point: Where description is wrong, statutory terms override caveat emptor.

## Practical Applications

- For buyers (business or private):
  - Inspect thoroughly; for property, commission surveys and searches; for vehicles, obtain independent reports; for machinery, test and review maintenance records.
  - Ask clear written questions; seek written warranties on points that matter (age, mileage, previous use, compliance with standards).
  - Keep copies of adverts, descriptions, and samples supplied; these can form part of the contract.
  - In B2B purchases, negotiate quality and fitness clauses; do not rely solely on informal assurances.
  - In consumer purchases, be aware of statutory rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and cancellation rights for distance sales.
  - Act promptly if a defect emerges; remedies can be time‑sensitive (e.g., 30‑day short‑term right to reject for consumers).

- For sellers (business or private):
  - Avoid making statements that you cannot support. If you give a statement of fact, ensure it is accurate and remains accurate up to completion.
  - Do not conceal defects. Active steps to hide problems can amount to fraud.
  - Use precise contract terms. In B2B contracts, “as is” or “with all faults” can be used, subject to reasonableness under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.
  - In consumer sales, do not attempt to exclude or limit CRA 2015 rights. Ensure descriptions are accurate, provide required pre‑contract information for distance sales, and have clear returns procedures.
  - Consider an entire agreement and non‑reliance clause to manage misrepresentation risk, but remember these are subject to Misrepresentation Act 1967 section 3 reasonableness.
  - Train sales staff to avoid careless statements and to escalate technical queries.

- Drafting tips (B2B):
  - Define “satisfactory quality” benchmarks (standards, inspection protocols, acceptance tests).
  - Specify exclusive remedies (repair/replace/credit) where lawful and reasonable.
  - Include a process for pre‑delivery inspection and acceptance.
  - Align warranties with maintenance and usage obligations; exclude damage from misuse where reasonable.
  - Ensure any exclusions meet the UCTA reasonableness test (bargaining power, availability of insurance, transparency).

- Property transactions:
  - Buyers should rely on surveys, enquiries, and professional advice; sellers should complete property information forms carefully and truthfully.
  - Remember that caveat emptor still has force in property, but misstatements in replies to enquiries can found a claim.

- Online sales:
  - Traders must provide accurate descriptions and required pre‑contract information; consumers often have cancellation rights.
  - Keep records of product pages and communications; these form the descriptive basis of the contract.

## Summary Checklist

- Caveat emptor: the buyer bears risk of defects discoverable on reasonable inspection unless protected by terms or misrepresentation rules.
- No shield for dishonesty: misrepresentation (including concealment and half‑truths) removes protection for the seller.
- Statutes matter:
  - SGA 1979 ss 13–15 imply terms on description, quality, and sample (mainly B2B/private).
  - CRA 2015 ss 9–11 impose non‑excludable quality, fitness, and description duties in consumer contracts.
  - UCTA 1977 and MA 1967 control exclusion and non‑reliance clauses via reasonableness.
- Description and sample can convert assumptions into binding terms.
- Patent vs latent defects: buyers are expected to spot the obvious; hidden defects often turn on terms, misrepresentation, and consumer law.
- Practical steps: inspect, ask, record, agree clear warranties/limitations, and act quickly on defects.
- Key cases: Smith v Hughes; Ward v Hobbs; Keates v Cadogan; Gordon v Selico; Beale v Taylor.

## Quick Reference

| Concept                    | Authority                        | Key takeaway                                             |
| -------------------------- | -------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| Caveat emptor (baseline)   | Common law                       | Buyer bears risk absent term or misrepresentation        |
| Misrepresentation          | Misrepresentation Act 1967       | False inducing statements allow rescission and damages   |
| B2B quality/fitness        | Sale of Goods Act 1979 ss 13–15  | Implied terms; may be limited if reasonable under UCTA   |
| Consumer quality/fitness   | Consumer Rights Act 2015 ss 9–11 | Non‑excludable rights with tiered remedies               |
| Excluding liability        | UCTA 1977; MA 1967 s 3           | Exclusions/non‑reliance must be reasonable               |
| Sale by sample/description | SGA 1979 s 15; CRA 2015 (sample) | Bulk must match sample; goods must match description     |
| Active concealment         | Gordon v Selico (1986)           | Concealment is fraud; caveat emptor offers no protection |

Caveat Emptor in Contract Law: Rules, Limits, and Cases