## Facts

- A federal grand jury indicted six private individuals in the Athens, Georgia area under 18 U.S.C. § 241 for conspiring to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate Black citizens in the enjoyment of federal rights.
- The indictment alleged a single conspiracy carried out through assaults, shootings, intimidation, and causing arrests of Black citizens through false reports to law enforcement.
- The targeted rights included equal use of state-owned or state-operated public facilities, the right to engage in interstate travel, and equal enjoyment of places of public accommodation protected by Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
- The defendants moved to dismiss on the ground that the indictment did not charge an offense under federal law.
- The district court dismissed the indictment, reasoning that § 241 protected only “national citizenship” rights; it also treated the public-accommodations allegation as defective and viewed Title II’s enforcement scheme as exclusive.
- The United States took a direct appeal to the Supreme Court under the Criminal Appeals Act.

## Issues

1. Whether the Supreme Court had jurisdiction under the Criminal Appeals Act to review dismissal of the indictment’s Title II public-accommodations allegation.
2. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 241 reaches conspiracies to interfere with rights secured by the Fourteenth Amendment, including equal protection rights related to use of state public facilities.
3. Whether allegations of state involvement (including misuse of law-enforcement processes) are sufficient to bring a conspiracy within Fourteenth Amendment coverage for purposes of § 241.
4. Whether § 241, applied to conspiracies targeting Fourteenth Amendment rights, is void for vagueness.
5. Whether there is a constitutionally protected right to interstate travel that qualifies as a “right or privilege secured by the Constitution” for purposes of § 241 (at least where state involvement is alleged).

## Decision

- The Court held it lacked jurisdiction under the Criminal Appeals Act to review the dismissal of the public-accommodations portion of the indictment because the lower court’s ruling rested at least in part on a pleading-based ground rather than solely on statutory construction.
- The Court reversed the dismissal of the indictment insofar as it charged a § 241 conspiracy to interfere with Fourteenth Amendment rights, rejecting the view that § 241 is limited to “national citizenship” rights.
- The Court held the indictment sufficiently alleged state involvement—particularly through allegations that defendants caused arrests via false reports—such that the conspiracy could amount to a deprivation of Fourteenth Amendment rights.
- The Court rejected the vagueness challenge, emphasizing § 241’s specific-intent requirement as a limiting feature.
- The Court recognized a constitutional right to travel from state to state and held that an alleged conspiracy to interfere with interstate travel, accompanied by state involvement, stated an offense under § 241.
- The Court did not definitively decide whether Congress may punish purely private conspiracies interfering with Fourteenth Amendment rights absent any state involvement.

## Legal Principles

- 18 U.S.C. § 241 reaches conspiracies to interfere with “any right or privilege secured” by the Constitution, including rights secured by the Fourteenth Amendment.
- For Fourteenth Amendment-based § 241 prosecutions, allegations that the conspiracy used or enlisted state processes or officials can satisfy the state-action component.
- § 241 is not void for indefiniteness when applied to constitutional rights because the offense requires specific intent to interfere with a known federal right.
- The Constitution protects a right to interstate travel, and interference with that right may be prosecuted under § 241 at least when state involvement is alleged.
- The decision left unresolved, in the Court’s holding, the full extent of Congress’s enforcement power to reach purely private conspiracies interfering with Fourteenth Amendment rights without state involvement.

## Conclusion

The Court reinstated key portions of a § 241 indictment, holding that the statute covers conspiracies targeting Fourteenth Amendment rights when state involvement is alleged, rejected a vagueness challenge based on § 241’s specific-intent requirement, and confirmed the constitutional status of the right to interstate travel, while declining to settle whether purely private conspiracies are reachable under Congress’s Fourteenth Amendment enforcement power.


United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966)