## Facts

- James B. Walliser and Carol Sue Walliser filed joint federal income tax returns for 1973 and 1974.
- James was a vice president and branch manager at a savings and loan association, responsible for marketing permanent and interim loans and meeting loan production quotas; his loan production affected compensation decisions.
- In 1973, the Wallisers paid (without employer reimbursement) for two foreign group “builders’ tours”: one to Rio de Janeiro and another to London and Copenhagen.
- The tours were attended primarily by builders and related industry participants; James attended to build social relationships with builders to generate future loan business.
- The trips were primarily recreational; there were no formal business meetings and no specific loan negotiations during the tours.
- The Wallisers deducted the tour costs as ordinary and necessary business expenses under I.R.C. § 162.
- The Commissioner disallowed the deductions and determined deficiencies for 1973 and 1974, treating the costs as entertainment subject to I.R.C. § 274.

## Issues

1. Whether the foreign “builders’ tour” expenses were ordinary and necessary business expenses deductible under I.R.C. § 162.
2. If deductible under § 162, whether the tours were “entertainment, amusement, or recreation” under I.R.C. § 274 and, if so, whether the expenses satisfied § 274’s requirements (including the “directly related to” test).

## Decision

- The court held the tour expenses were ordinary and necessary business expenses under I.R.C. § 162 because they were proximately related to James’s loan marketing work.
- The court held the tours constituted “entertainment, amusement, or recreation” under I.R.C. § 274 and applicable regulations.
- The court held the expenses were nondeductible because the tours were primarily for goodwill and relationship building and were not “directly related to the active conduct” of the taxpayer’s business within the meaning of § 274.
- The court sustained the Commissioner’s disallowance of the deductions and the resulting deficiencies.

## Legal Principles

- An expense may satisfy I.R.C. § 162 as ordinary and necessary yet still be disallowed if it falls within I.R.C. § 274’s entertainment limits.
- Recreational travel or vacation-style activities used for business socializing can constitute “entertainment, amusement, or recreation” under § 274 and Treasury regulations.
- Goodwill-oriented entertainment generally does not satisfy § 274’s “directly related to the active conduct of the taxpayer’s trade or business” requirement absent concrete, contemporaneous business discussion or similar qualifying business content.
- Section 274 operates as a separate, stricter limitation that can override a deduction otherwise allowable under § 162.

## Conclusion

The Tax Court ruled that while the taxpayers’ foreign builders’ tours were business-motivated and ordinary under § 162, the recreational trips were entertainment under § 274 and were nondeductible because they served mainly to generate goodwill rather than being directly related to active business conduct.


Walliser v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 433 (1979)